Dept of Transport admits: Hoon withholding information about Heathrow from MPs

I recently sent Geoff Hoon an email concerning his statement to the House of Commons on the third Heathrow runway. Whilst I was asking him a rather obscure and pedantic point relating to the language he used, the reply I got is rather revealing.

To that end [deciding about the third runway], the Secretary of State reached his decision on the basis of a transparent and objective analysis of the evidence available as a result of the consultation that has taken place. He alone had the necessary knowledge of all the facts and issues that required consideration.

It would not have been appropriate for Parliament to participate in making the decision. Parliament would not have had access to all of the facts, assumptions and analyses that underpinned his decision.” [emphasis added]

So, Mr Hoon, just what information did you withhold from the UK’s sovereign decision-making body, which is meant to scrutinise your decisions and hold you accountable on behalf of the public?

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/12415 for Twitter and emails.

3 Comments

  • David Heigham 11th Mar '09 - 1:03pm

    A Freedom of Information request?
    ‘Please list all the facts, assumptions and analyses that Parliament would not have had access to?’

  • Was just about to say what David H says above. Definitely worth a go.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEwan Hoyle 23rd May - 5:19pm
    Lester I think you underestimate how essential media coverage was to their likely plan. If they had known that media coverage would have been absolutely...
  • User AvatarEwan Hoyle 23rd May - 5:12pm
    Lucas, I accept that your answer to the question is an emphatic NO, but I believe the government have at least a duty to inform...
  • User Avatarmatt 23rd May - 5:06pm
    The only censorship that should have occurred, should have been Blurring out the image of the terrorist from the neck down, so as to spare...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 23rd May - 4:52pm
    Do you think Ajmal would write for us, Lester?
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 23rd May - 4:50pm
    This is a very welcome and important initiative, though I don't doubt the difficulty it faces in overcoming protectionist forces on both sides of the...
Sun 26th May 2013
Tue 28th May 2013
Wed 29th May 2013
Thu 30th May 2013
Fri 31st May 2013
Sat 1st Jun 2013
10:00
Mon 3rd Jun 2013
Thu 6th Jun 2013
Fri 7th Jun 2013
Sat 8th Jun 2013
Sun 9th Jun 2013
Thu 13th Jun 2013
Sat 15th Jun 2013
Tue 18th Jun 2013
Thu 20th Jun 2013