DLT: Keynesianism

For the past year, Duncan Brack and Ed Randall, authors of the Dictionary of Liberal Thought, have kindly agreed to let us publish extracts on Lib Dem Voice. Last month’s instalment was John Maynard Keynes; this month, Keynesianism. You can read previous chapters on LDV here. The entire book is available on Amazon here and can also be bought at the Westminster Bookshop.

Keynesianism

A school of economic thought inspired by the work of John Maynard Keynes, especially his General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Keynes’s challenge to the ideas underpinning classical and neo-classical economics, and in particular to the proposition that market economies would always find an equilibrium consistent with the highest possible level of economic output, became the foundation for macroeconomics, and Keynesian ideas came to underpin the economic policy of Western governments for the three decades following the Second World War.

In the General Theory, first published in 1936, John Maynard Keynes (q.v.) challenged the majority of his peers in the economics profession, who had steadfastly rejected his notion that there was any need for a branch of economics that distinguished between the behaviour of individual economic actors and the operation of the economy as a whole.

Keynesians generally support the following three propositions: (a) aggregate demand plays a central role in determining the level of real output; (b) economies can remain for a long period in a state where there is substantial under-utilisation of both capital and labour; and (c) government, principally though not exclusively through its fiscal policies, can influence aggregate demand and thus help bring about significant reductions in unemployment.

Keynesianism came to dominate economic policy-making after 1945 when the reflationary actions of the US government, principally designed to boost the production of munitions and weapons, appeared to confirm Keynes’s theoretical arguments about the fundamental importance of government taking the initiative in overcoming failures in aggregate demand. The general acceptance of the three Keynesian propositions seemed to have been confirmed when Richard Nixon observed that ‘we are all Keynesians now’. However, critics of Keynesianism, most notably the American economist Milton Friedman (q.v.), began a counter-revolution in economic thought that attracted political leaders and economic policy-makers from the mid-1970s onwards, including James Callaghan and Margaret Thatcher in Britain, whose statements and policy decisions appeared to reject all or part of Keynesianism.

British economic policy-makers were confronted in the 1970s by ‘stagflation’: low or no growth accompanied by inflation. This was taken as evidence that Keynesian policies for combating unemployment could no longer be expected to work. Friedman argued that government action to boost demand in order to reduce unemployment below its ‘natural rate’ was counter-productive: it would simply raise inflation and add to inflationary expectations in economies.

The counter-revolutionary policy prescriptions offered by Friedman and his colleagues were tested (some say to destruction) in Britain, where the Conservative governments of the 1980s adopted a monetarist strategy. They failed, however, to produce either the stable monetary environment or the economic recovery that had been expected. Friedman himself declared, in June 2003, that ‘use of the quantity of money as a target has not been a success … I’m not sure I would as of today push it as hard as I once did’.

Keynesianism has enjoyed something of a revival since the 1980s, although it has undergone considerable development and reformulation in an effort to integrate Keynes’s theoretical ideas about the operation of the economic system as a whole with classical and neo-classical ideas about the behaviour of individual consumers and producers. In particular, Keynesians have accepted that while human beings are not perfectly rational, human behaviour sufficiently approximates rational behaviour – of the kind hypothesised by economists – so that it is possible to develop models of the economy that can handle long lags between changes in output, employment rates, inflation and interest rates.

Some Keynesians have tried to take account of the growth of international trade and increasing economic interdependence in their economic theorising, and to make the case for internationally coordinated economic policy treating the whole world as a single global economic system. Whether their economic and political ambitions have any real prospect of success is arguable. Perhaps the most important element of the Keynesian legacy is the conclusion that market economies are inherently unstable and that there can be no guarantee that they will, unaided, find a balance that makes full use of the economic resources, including labour, that are available to them. What Will Hutton has described as Keynes’s ‘very shocking’ finding – that capitalist economic systems are inherently unstable – is rightly regarded as a watershed in the development of economic thought.

Further reading

 

 

 

 

• Will Hutton, The Revolution That Never Was: An Assessment of Keynesian Economics (Vintage, 2001)

• John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936)

• Charles P. Kindleberger, Keynesianism vs Monetarism (Routledge, 2005)

Ed Randall

The Dictionary of Liberal Thought is one of the many titles available from the Liberal Democrat History Group. Find out more about them on their website.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Dictionary of Liberal Thought.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/8057 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Richard,
    Perhaps unsurprisingly, Paul Krugman in ‘Peddling Prosperity’ takes precisely the opposite tack!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarChris_sh 20th Dec - 11:38pm
    @Paul Walter Apologies if "political types" offends you, it was intended as a term to include everyone from the PM down to the lowliest door...
  • User AvatarChris_sh 20th Dec - 10:00pm
    @JohnTilley 20th Dec '14 - 3:32am "By 24th June 1944 there were 233,000 casualties and losses in the invasion of Normandy." You are talking about...
  • User AvatarMark S 20th Dec - 9:32pm
    For those against the idea of a Universal Basic Income, I have one question for you. What's your plan to deal with the inevitable automation...
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 20th Dec - 8:06pm
    Parliaments were of rooks. For ever gathering together with their own kind, squawking, bullying other birds, covering the world beneath them with excrement. Tony
  • User AvatarJane Ann Liston 20th Dec - 8:05pm
    One anomaly a basic income for everybody would solve is the fact that while income tax is based on the individual's income, benefits are awarded...
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 20th Dec - 7:59pm
    John Tilley - I think it's about 50-50 (I write "about" without checking the earlier lists in detail - the last list was 3-3). Paul...