Opinion: Should the Queen speak out on the Belfast flag issue?

Queen Elizabeth IIThe pictures of the Queen joining the Cabinet meeting were charming. They conveyed a reassuring image of a stable democracy with a historic back-stop. Almost always we want the democratic element to prevail, but there are perhaps very limited issues and occasions when the monarchy can make a difference. The Queen inviting Harold Macmillan to form a government rather than Rab Butler in 1957 is the occasion often quoted. It did actually make a political difference, since Harold Wilson was later reported as having feared that Rab Butler may well have won the 1964 election.

Northern Ireland may be another occasion when the monarchy could make a difference. We are witnessing renewed conflict in Northern Ireland over the decision to fly the Union flag less frequently at Belfast City Hall. I wonder what the effect would be if the Queen herself were to make a speech calling on so called ‘loyalists’ to desist from violent protest? It would call the bluff of those who make much of their ‘loyalty’ to the Crown, were the Crown itself to require them to behave considerately. And I imagine such a move would have the full support of the democratically elected government.

* Geoff Crocker is a professional economist whose book A Managerial Philosophy of Technology is published by Palgrave Macmillan.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Frank Furter 31st Dec '12 - 10:43am

    By convention the Queen can only speak in public after the advice and consent of her government. I would not expect that her government would advise her to do this, nor would they consent. Why not? In the first place, she would be addressing and criticising only one section of the population. I know very little about the local details of Northern Irish politics, but I am careful not to accuse only one side of acting without consideration. But, secondly, the law of unintended consequences will certainly apply; calling the loyalists bluff might result in a very great destabilisation of a society which appears – despite all the occasional setbacks – to be making some progress.

  • Eddie Sammon 31st Dec '12 - 12:00pm

    There should be no place for a monarchy within a democracy and we definitely shouldn’t romanticise it.

  • Eddie Sammon 31st Dec '12 - 2:05pm

    Peter, that is true, I was just venting my frustrations.

  • Paul in Twickenham 31st Dec '12 - 3:00pm

    To assume that “The Queen” would have any impact on the street protests is to fall into the mistake of taking symbols too literally. It’s rather like suggesting that The Troubles were the result of a disagreement about transubstantiation or the doctrine of justification and that the whole thing could have been cleared up by a inter-faith summit.

    These signifiers (Catholic, Protestant, Republican, Loyalist) are just indicators of cultural and social position. They don’t mean anything in themselves. If the queen was to walk through Donegall Square swinging her handbag at the demonstrators it wouldn’t make any difference.

    This is about identity and culture. I don’t believe that anything The Queen might or might not say would make a difference, but it would be interesting to see it put to the test…

  • Geoff,

    in your article you note “there are perhaps very limited issues and occasions when the monarchy can make a difference.”.

    I would agree but do not think the present trouble in Northern Ireland is one of these occassions, for the reasons that Paul in Twickenham has spelled out above.

    Frank Furter comments “By convention the Queen can only speak in public after the advice and consent of her government. I would not expect that her government would advise her to do this, nor would they consent” I thik Frank has called this right. Constitutional monarchy in the United Kingdom is based on this principle of staying above the fray of adversarial politics and maintaining a strict regime of impartiallity.

    There was some furrowing of the Brows at the time of her Siver Jubilee n 1977, when the Queen reminded politicians of the benefits of the Union, a comment widely interpreted as a criticism of devolution. Speaking as part of her 2002 Golden Jubilee celebrations in Scotland, she took a rare step on to the political stage, when she praised the work carried out by the parliament and paid tribute to the role devolution had played in strengthening the Union.

    The Queens visit to the Irish Republic last year and to Northern Ireland as part of her Diamond Jubiliee celebrations were a recognition of the improvements in British-Irish relations since the Good Friday peace deal was signed in 1998. It is these kind of State Visits by monarchy, interacting with the leading politicians in Ireland, where the Palace can best play a role in easing tensions.

  • markfairclough 31st Dec '12 - 5:13pm

    i,ll say the unforgivable , the Queen should speak out in favour of the flag

  • A bizarely simplistic view, remember the Queen is the head of state so teh laws are technically her laws, how often do you thing the Loyalists were thinking about over the troubles.

  • Richard Dean 2nd Jan '13 - 1:30pm

    The paranoia and self-interest would probably find a way. Oi! The Queen’s a prisoner acting under duress, we have to ignore/rescue her! Oi! The Queen has lost her mind, we have to replace her! Oi! We fly the flag to save the monarchy!

  • markfairclough 2nd Jan '13 - 10:38pm

    funny thing is my former MP was a LABOUR secretary of state forNORTHERN IRELAND & very much pro unionist

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 20th Sep - 3:53am
    John Littler's arguments are overwhelming, but Leavers simply ignore them and resort to the often-heard but never-costed sovereignty-nonsense. Assuming the general public remains equally unreacheable...
  • User AvatarAllan Brame 19th Sep - 10:51pm
    @ Dave Orbison You are wrong to suggest Vince was delivering "negative same old" or that he was not offering hope. Look at this section,...
  • User AvatarDave Orbison 19th Sep - 9:43pm
    Mark - fair point then, I will.
  • User AvatarCllr Mark Wright 19th Sep - 9:02pm
    @Dave Orbison - these are snippets from the full speech, which was much longer. Criticism of May's Tories was a constant theme, and there was...
  • User AvatarJohn Littler 19th Sep - 8:24pm
    PJ, Sovereignty should have been taken apart as an argument. It is not possible to go to the kind of cut yourself off from your...
  • User AvatarSheila Gee 19th Sep - 8:14pm
    “The British just are not that European and the referendum provided an opportunity to demonstrate it.” I would agree with that for the most part,...