Eric Avebury writes… Bernie Ecclestone, F1 and Britain’s shameful friendship with Bahrain

ecclestone bahrainBernie Ecclestone is an appropriate person to be the public face of Formula 1, a ‘sport’ which is fast becoming known as the event of choice for autocrats who wish to launder their international reputation, as evidenced by the appearance of races in Bahrain and Dubai in recent years.

Ecclestone famously praised Thatcher, Hitler and Saddam a few years ago, saying that he preferred strong leaders, that Hitler was a man who was ‘able to get things done’, and yet paradoxically, that politics ‘is not for me’.

Equally bizarre, he continues to support the Bahraini régime, asserting that ‘I haven’t had any negative reports from anybody there’. That could be because he hasn’t spoken to the Bahrain Center for Human Rights, the main opposition Party Al-Wefaq, the Bahrain Freedom Movement or the people who take part in the daily demonstrations against the ruling al-Khalifa family. His informants are the royal family themselves and their acolytes, who are responsible for widespread discrimination against the opposition, and suppression of dissent.

Thirteen leading political and human rights activists are serving life or long determinate sentences of imprisonment.

Demonstrators are bombarded at close range with birdshot and teargas canisters. Hundreds are arrested, and around 90 people have died from state violence and torture since the uprising began in February 2011.

No opposition press or broadcasting is allowed, and social media is subject to intense surveillance, using the UK company Gamma’s FinSpy software, regularly touted at UK arms and security expos.

At last year’s F1 race in Bahrain, a man was killed by security forces in a crackdown aimed at preventing the international media from recording any signs of opposition. When a Channel 4 team tried to go into deprived villages where the opposition’s supporters live, they were arrested and deported.

If the race does go ahead this year, it will be the duty of the media to use it as the introduction to a closer scrutiny of Bahrain’s abysmal record on human rights, democracy and the rule of law. They should also look at Britain’s shameful friendship with this former colony of ours. We supplied them with their chief torturer Ian Henderson in the 1990s, and today they are regular buddies with the Queen and the Prime Minister. This doesn’t stack up with our claim to promote the freedoms we enjoy ourselves across the globe.

This is all a matter of indifference to Ecclestone. He reportedly told the Bahraini activist Alaa Shehabi last year that he wouldn’t mind if the race was cancelled, because he had already cashed the check from the Bahraini government. His priority is profit and he evinces no sign of concern about the suffering of those who have to pay the price for it.

Let’s hope that Bahrain will follow in the steps of South Africa, where the Formula 1 races were cancelled in 1985 amid rising international awareness of the moral bankruptcy of the Apartheid regime. Bahrain’s regime is equally discriminatory and corrupt, and deserves the same fate.

* Eric Lubbock, Lord Avebury, is a working peer, and Vice-Chair, Parliamentary Human Rights Group. He blogs here.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34026 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • At least Ecclestone is honest that he only cares about money. Our politicians have much murkier dealings with the Bahrainis but would never admit that it is just about money.

  • Caron Lindsay Caron Lindsay 16th Apr '13 - 5:47pm

    Agreed, Eric. It vexes me that Ecclestone insists on racing there. I say that as a huge F1 fan, too.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 26th Nov - 10:56am
    @Tsar Nicolas "This talk of getting 28 seats when the current polls show the party on around 7% – OK, I’ll be generous and say...
  • User AvatarJohn Stevens 26th Nov - 10:54am
    Et tu Brute?
  • User AvatarD McKay 26th Nov - 10:48am
    Thanks Roland. I suppose my question would be (and I don't expect anyone to know the answer!) how many of those in the 60,000 would...
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 26th Nov - 10:42am
    Sorry ... Charles ... yet another 'Kingdom for a preview/amend button' request!
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 26th Nov - 10:40am
    Charles Rothwell26th Nov '14 - 7:27am "I pray the mathematics will not allow us back into government in the form of a coalition. The wave...
  • User Avatariain 26th Nov - 10:38am
    ' I seem to remember from recent discussions the figure of 60,000 on JSA in 2013 was cited, but putting this into context this represented...