Election hustings meetings: Electoral Commission relaxes rules

A wider range of meetings at which people get to question Parliamentary candidates should be exempt from election expense limits according to new guidance from the Electoral Commission.

The Electoral Commission’s previous guidance was that costs related to hustings meetings did not need to feature in any of the individual candidate election expense returns if all the candidates for a constituency were invited. This was a welcome simplification of the previous position where many meeting organisers (partly for good reasons and partly for more debatable ones) believed that in practice they could only organise a hustings meeting if everyone agreed to attend. In other words, the Commission’s guidance was a good thing as it encouraged more public meetings.

The Electoral Commission now advises that in addition to this, a meeting does not count towards expenses if it is run by an organisation which only invites its own members to it. In these circumstances, not all the candidates need be invited and it will still be the case that the meeting does not count towards election expenses.

Although the original guidance was good and worked well, this new guidance open up a bit of a loophole. Most notably, a trade union could organise a meeting for its members to which only the Labour Party candidate and one fringe candidate is invited. It could publicise this meeting (including the names of the Labour Party and other candidate) to its members, without those costs having to count towards the Labour election expense limit or indeed being limited in any other way. For example, the trade union could phone all its members asking them to come and hear the Labour Party candidate (and fringe candidate) speak to them.

In some areas that would be a significant boost to the Labour candidate’s name recognition. It would also boost the fringe candidate, but if they are out of the running in the election that would still be net advantage to the Labour Party.

To the Commission’s credit, the initial version of their revised guidance suggested this loophole would work even if only the Labour Party candidate is invited, but when I raised the issue, they said they would change the guidance to say that at least two candidates must be invited to a meeting for it to count as a hustings.

That’s better, but it still leaves the possibility that foolishness, maliciousness or desperation will drive some people towards trying to use this loophole. As with all Electoral Commission guidance, what the guidance says is not necessarily what the courts would rule. However, the defence of “I was following the regulator’s official guidance” is a powerful one, particularly in any cases involving a jury.

Fingers crossed then.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 23rd Aug - 10:12am
    The Liberal Democrats could consider supporting a move in the Welsh Assembly for representatives to job-share. Caroline Lucas job-shares the leadership of the Green Party,...
  • User Avatarexpats 23rd Aug - 10:04am
    Yes! She was right to resign...Not because of what she said but because she felt that having said what needed to be said the backlash,...
  • User AvatarJohn Probert 23rd Aug - 10:01am
    The EU is a common trading area, which implies freedom of movement for both people and goods in order to make it a level playing...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 23rd Aug - 9:58am
    https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Rawalpindi which was before the Atlee government accepted that India should be independent. We are currently seeing reviews of the effects of partition, massive loss...
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 23rd Aug - 9:49am
    It is an amazing commentary on the Trump regime that renewed military involvement in Afghanistan is seen as somehow sensible!
  • User AvatarNeil Sandison 23rd Aug - 9:45am
    Europe needs GB more than ever at this point in time with the refugee crisis from the countries we and our American allies did much...