Elections staff set to miss out on pay if they do a bad job

Amendments 265 and 266 to the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill may not have grabbed any headlines but they mark a very welcome change in policy – for under them the fees paid to referendum counting officers will only be paid in full if they meet an adequate standard of performance. Poor performance will now mean less pay.

At the general election, the returning officers in Sheffield and Hackney voluntarily decided to forgo their fees following the major organisational failures in the elections there. However, this was purely a voluntary act as there was no system for judging performance before deciding whether or not, or how much, to pay.

Although these amendments are only relevant to the referendum, they set a welcome precedent for elections of other sorts when the legislation for them is next reviewed.

There is a more radical question of whether such fees are now a nineteenth century anachronism given that those receiving the fees are almost always post holders such as local authority Chief Executives, who are anyway in receipt of a full-time salary from their local council for a job that already expects out of normal office hours work and where workloads are based on the assumption that elections will need administering. In addition, as election fees boost pension entitlements, the long term costs of them is significantly more than the simple lump sum.

In another small but welcome change, the boundaries along which the referendum will be organised in Scotland and Wales will now be the same as for the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections. I had raised this issue with the government on behalf of colleagues in Wales who were rightly concerned about the possibility of having Assembly elections and the referendum on the same day but having one organised along local council lines and one along Welsh Assembly constituencies lines as the two often cut across each other. That risk has now been removed.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 25th Sep - 5:58pm
    Writing in The Times of 25 September 2017 Philip Collins reviews the ten best speeches ever. Times2 pages 4-7, John Kennedy struck out all uses...
  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 25th Sep - 5:30pm
    Peter, Richard -- I'm not entirely sure about 'continual' plebiscites, but neither am I sure about Richard's dictum of the primacy of the businesses who...
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 25th Sep - 5:14pm
    What an excellent article and what a debate it has generated! There's an interesting article in the Times today which suggested that the decision to...
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 25th Sep - 5:12pm
    paul barker 25th Sep '17 - 3:40pm "This issue raises one of the clearest differences between Liberalism & Labourism & affects mostly younger people." If...
  • User AvatarRichard Kilpatrick 25th Sep - 5:01pm
    Thank you all for your contributions. Ian and Maureen - Tees Valley Region (which includes Darlington) is in a much better position than the North...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 25th Sep - 4:54pm
    @Paul Ankers I simply said that EARS had now produced a tool called EARS lite which does all that minivan can do and more PLUS...