Good news as Electoral Commission decides to preserve local donation records

The Electoral Commission is plugging a gap in the record of political donations following a decision to change its policy on retaining copies of constituency candidate expense returns.

Donations made direct to a candidate (rather than to their party) are only recorded in these constituency returns and do not appear in the donation records published by the Electoral Commission. However, in previous Parliaments both the local copies of these returns kept by electoral officials and the copies gathered in by the Electoral Commission were destroyed after a handful of years. This meant that even before the next general election was held, records were no longer available of who had donated how much to which candidate at the previous general election.

Having raised the issue previously, I took advantage of a recent meeting with the Electoral Commission’s Chief Executive, Jenny Watson, to ask whether there was any news on it.

After checking the details, back now has come the good news from her that the Electoral Commission will in future retain its copies of constituency returns for seven years and after that will consider transferring them to the National Archives. Aside from the regulatory benefits, that would also mean that this source of information about electioneering will be preserved for future political scientists and historians to make use of.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/21369 for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

  • James from Durham 28th Sep '10 - 1:42pm

    Yes, we must keep ll the records so that future generations have the material to publish research papaers and dissertations and generally develop academic careers. For heaven’s sake, destroying records is like squandering the earth’s natural resources.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evans 21st May - 5:15pm
    @Paul Pettinger "Your argument does not make sense Helen. Why can’t Adrian choose not to campaign for homophobic MPs as a matter of his conscience?...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 21st May - 4:57pm
    Oranjepan If all those discontented LibDem activists losing their nerve are reflected in this thread… "Losing their nerve" is a pejorative phrase. Clegg and the...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 21st May - 4:52pm
    Matthew Huntbach can people like Stephen Tall at least acknowledge that I meant Stephen Gilbert there - too used to article here by the other...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 21st May - 4:48pm
    David, it is not a matter of the answer I want. It is a standard trick of con-men to present misleading information, whip people up...
  • User AvatarJoeBourke 21st May - 4:41pm
    As I understand it, Britain is the only Nato country not to offer asylum to their 400 Afghan interpreters. All Iraqi interpreters were offered the...