What does Eric Pickles think of Andy Coulson’s salary?

I only wonder but … the job of being a local council Chief Executive involves being responsible for far more staff, far bigger budgets and (much though I think my colleagues in our media team are important) far more important issues than heading up a media team.

The awful fallout if a council bungles its Children’s Services is perhaps the starkest indication of how much more important running a council is than running a media team.

Yesterday Eric Pickles was in the news attacking councils, some of whom paying their chief executives six figures salaries. Leaving aside the embarrassing for him point that six out of the eight top council payers are in fact Conservative controlled, I wonder where this leaves his view of Andy Coulson’s £270,000 salary as the Conservative Party’s Head of Communications?

Surely on his own logic, that must be a very inflated salary and rather a waste of Conservative Party members’ funds? Just thought I’d ask.

Share:
This entry was posted in Opposition watch and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/8818 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

9 Comments

  • Posted 31st December 2008 at 10:15 am | Permalink

    Were any taxpayers harmed?

  • Posted 31st December 2008 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    Are you suggesting that Conservative members don’t pay taxes?? ;)

  • Posted 31st December 2008 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    As Guido points out, if the Tories were using taxpayers money to pay Coulson you would have a point, but they’re not so you don’t.

  • Posted 31st December 2008 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    Guido/Dizzy – surely the point is that the Tories accept, when making their own appointments, that you have to pay a market wage to attract good quality staff? Yet the Tories seem to think that council tax-payers’ interests are best served by appointing folk who might not be up to the job simply ‘cos they’ll accept a lower salary.

    And I thought you guys were supposed to believe in the workings of the market being applied to the public sector…?

  • Old Hack
    Posted 31st December 2008 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Since you people are so keen at sneering at the Tories, perhaps you might want to remind yourselves of 3 reasons to be contrite:

    Check out Mr Isaby’s nomination for the worst gaffe of 2008 at Con Home. Who needs Andy Coulson more, the Tories or you lot?

  • Posted 1st January 2009 at 9:44 am | Permalink
  • Posted 2nd January 2009 at 1:28 pm | Permalink

    Guido – true, Vince said just that. And I had a go at him for saying it on LDV here. Consistency is generally a good thing, whether in the Lib Dems or Tories.

  • Posted 2nd January 2009 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Dizzy/Guido: Surely a politician who avows fiscal prudence should practice what he preaches?

    The main reason why Chief Executives of local authorities can command six figure salaries is that local authorities are competing with the private sector for wages. You can’t have it both ways, saying the one is fine while the other should be condemned. They are interconnected.

  • Posted 2nd January 2009 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Guido: we don’t pay our head of media £270,000. The issue is Tory hypocrisy – they are happy with rates of pay for themselves that they criticise for others.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?