http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:55:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-108276 Peter Watt’s Inside Out: book review | Mark Pack Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:26:34 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-108276 [...] sat in the same Electoral Commission meetings as me. He had received the same emails as myself (including this one).  He’d had the same document from the Electoral Commission as me saying, “ Transferring a [...] [...] sat in the same Electoral Commission meetings as me. He had received the same emails as myself (including this one).  He’d had the same document from the Electoral Commission as me saying, “ Transferring a [...]

]]> http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-108091 Peter Watt’s Inside Out: book review Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:25:37 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-108091 [...] sat in the same Electoral Commission meetings as me. He had received the same emails as myself (including this one).  He’d had the same document from the Electoral Commission as me saying, “ Transferring a [...] [...] sat in the same Electoral Commission meetings as me. He had received the same emails as myself (including this one).  He’d had the same document from the Electoral Commission as me saying, “ Transferring a [...]

]]> http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-34938 Robin Young Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:21:55 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-34938 It's also interesting that BBC is saying Hilary Benn turned down a donation from Miss Kidd "because he thought Mr Abrahams should give his £5,000 in his own name." If that's right how did the perspicacious Mr Benn know that the money was in fact coming from Mr Abrahams. And if Hilary Benn knew, why didn't Harriet Harman? It’s also interesting that BBC is saying Hilary Benn turned down a donation from Miss Kidd “because he thought Mr Abrahams should give his £5,000 in his own name.” If that’s right how did the perspicacious Mr Benn know that the money was in fact coming from Mr Abrahams. And if Hilary Benn knew, why didn’t Harriet Harman?

]]> http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-34871 Mark Pack Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:43:11 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-34871 Thank you David. The weakness of your "rebuttal" is most reassuring :-) Toodle pip. Thank you David. The weakness of your “rebuttal” is most reassuring Toodle pip.

]]> http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-34856 fitaloon Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:09:22 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-34856 But Peter Watt has said he was aware of it and should then have reported it. But Peter Watt has said he was aware of it and should then have reported it.

]]> http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-34854 David Boothroyd Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:02:55 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/exclusive-labours-dodgy-donation-and-the-incriminating-email-1698.html#comment-34854 Is not the Electoral Commission guideline quite clear that it is the responsibility of the donor and the agent, and not the party, to check? "Where a person acts as an agent" they have to tell the party. The party does not appear to have any reciprocal duty in law to check. Is not the Electoral Commission guideline quite clear that it is the responsibility of the donor and the agent, and not the party, to check? “Where a person acts as an agent” they have to tell the party. The party does not appear to have any reciprocal duty in law to check.

]]>