Featherstone: 0.7% aid target will stick

Interviewed by The Independent, new International Development minister Lynne Featherstone stood by the target of giving 0.7% of GDP in international aid, and moreover setting that target in law:

Featherstone is adamant that the 0.7 per cent figure will be enshrined in law “as soon as we can get a legislative slot” and that Greening is “absolutely committed to it”.

Having been shuffled out of an equalities role in the UK, she will instead by taking up many equalities issues internationally in her new department:

Featherstone’s new brief at DfID covers women’s rights, including breaking the silence on the “eggshell” topic of female genital mutilation which is largely ignored by the mainstream.

She says there is now, for the first time, “huge momentum” within Africa to tackle the issue. She wants to see the practice eradicated – in the same way as foot-binding in China – within the next generation.

You can read the interview in full here.

Share this image on Facebook here or on Twitter here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/30351 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter 30th Sep - 6:48pm
    I've just checked the UK average wage. It looks as though Ms Lindsay's plan is to have average wage earners (and of course the 50%...
  • User AvatarPeter 30th Sep - 6:31pm
    @ jedibeeftrix Well said, but if I may point out that Ms Lindsay is insisting that capping the benefit is a disgrace. That means that...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 30th Sep - 6:19pm
    David Allen You ask this question ---" .....are you not at risk of making your own value judgment as to which “people” you wish to...
  • User AvatarGlenn Andrews 30th Sep - 6:12pm
    In his zeal this IDS chap looked one step away from appearing on stage in a twin set and pearls with a penguin glove puppet...
  • User Avatarjohnmc 30th Sep - 6:11pm
    Why is the benefits cap wrong in the first place, and why ought it not to decrease if circumstances require, (as average earnings have)? Even...
  • User Avatarjedibeeftrix 30th Sep - 6:10pm
    @ AndrewR - "If you earn that little it’s doubtful you’re even covering your own cost to the state never mind paying for anyone else."...