FFAC chair Greenland acknowledges LDV accreditation article was “unhelpful”

Liberal Democrat Voice at Conference

On Lib Dem Voice: Reportage | Live Twitter Stream | Contribute
On the official party website: Conference home
Watch Live on BBC Parliament

The chair of the Federal Finance and Administration Committee, Duncan Greenland has written an article in the Conference edition of Liberator on the highly controversial issue of Conference accreditation. A Liberal Democrat Voice poll in June, consistent with every other test of party opinion on the issue, showed that a majority of respondents opposed the system, which requires conference attendees to undergo police checks.

Mr Greenland felt that the Liberator coverage on the issue had been “misleading” and wanted to put the record straight about the process by which accreditation was approved. He stated that FFAC had become involved after a request by the Federal Conference Committee and passed a motion approving accreditation with one dissenting voice. He says that their rationale was based on perceived financial and commercial risks should an incident take place and insurers not pay out because police advice had not been followed.

Although he staunchly defended the decision, he did acknowledge flaws in the process of telling members the news, in particular an article co-authored by himself,  Party President Tim Farron and FCC chair Andrew Wiseman which appeared on this site on 21st May. Many people were angered by its inference that they did not care about the safety of Conference attendees, when in fact their opposition was based on there being no evidence that accreditation would make anybody safer.

The FFAC chair wrote:

The rather hastily prepared Liberal Democrat Voice article issued immediately after the decision was taken was in part clumsily worded and so unhelpful.

Although the arguments in the party about accreditation are bound to continue as many members are deeply uneasy about the system, it is good to see that its supporters may have learned lessons about the tone and language they use to defend it.

You can read the whole article by subscribing to Liberator here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Conference and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/30281 for Twitter and emails.

7 Comments

  • The trouble with this argument is that, you must take police (or, no doubt, insurance company) advice , is that it is fundamentally illiberal. This is much more so than the current right of centre Lib Dem obsession with “getting the state off our backs”. What it means is that unless we fit in with their mindset (essentially conservative, take no risks etc) we will lose out every time. Surely we should be on the side of breaking the bands of conformity etc? None of us would argue that that means throwing common sense precautions out of the window, but it does mean responsible bodies sometimes getting in there, and essentially throwing out such advice where it conflicts with our deeper societal aims.

    AND, it means campaigning for the removal of restrictive adherence to private sector – set rules in some cases.

  • Mark Smulian 19th Sep '12 - 11:37am

    Copies of the issue of Liberator concerned will also be on sale at our stall at Brighton.

  • jenny barnes 19th Sep '12 - 11:59am

    no-one shall be enslaved by conformity….

  • Mike Falchikov 19th Sep '12 - 12:35pm

    Th e Liberator article seemed to be saying that it wasn’t crime or terrorism that sold the idea of police checks, but the prospect of some(unspecified) compensation claim i.e. if some injury befalls me at conference, I would rush to sue the Party. This is pandering to the wretched compensation culture, yet another woeful feature of present-day Britain.

  • Simon Titley 19th Sep '12 - 2:45pm

    @Dave Page – The precise wording of the reference to LGBT+ Liberal Democrats in Duncan Greenland’s article reads as follows:

    “The very specific concerns of a small number of members who have previously lived under another identity were expressly recognised and addressed by an ‘opt-out’ scheme, the details of which were worked out in full consultation with LGBT+ Liberal Democrats.”

  • Tony Greaves 19th Sep '12 - 8:24pm

    I wonder what is the more unhelpful – the wording of an article (ie blame the message not the substance) – or the willingness of leading committees of a titular Liberal party to kowtow to this kind of nonsense?

    Tony Greaves

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohnTilley 21st Oct - 7:53am
    Eddie Sammon I was fascinated by your links to Lancaster University. My daughter has just started her fourth year studying there. I am not making...
  • User AvatarGeoff Payne 21st Oct - 7:49am
    Susan and Brian Taylor were wonderful people and they are much missed. When I was a candidate in Bromley in 2001, I used their house...
  • User AvatarCara Jenkinson 21st Oct - 7:39am
    Jedi - you compare corporates to private tax payers wanting to maximise the amount they can pass on to their children. I guess one difference...
  • User AvatarRobin McGhee 21st Oct - 7:21am
    Thanks everyone for the comments and I’m glad to see they’re mostly positive (I was actually expecting lots of negative ones). As a general point,...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 21st Oct - 7:06am
    David-1 20th Oct '14 - 1:14pm "I do not see what is so bad about “more politicians.” It means that more ordinary people have a...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 21st Oct - 6:48am
    Tony Greaves and George Potter both want a democratic structure for members of the party. Neither of them want the situation we have had in...