Final Eastleigh poll puts Lib Dems narrowly ahead of Tories – but all within margin of error!

What will (I assume) be the final poll of the Eastleigh by-election was published this morning. Conducted by Populus and commissioned by Lord Ashcroft, it shows the Lib Dems sustaining a narrow lead — significant in itself, but the more so as Eastleigh voters were interviewed over the weekend during which the controversy over allegations against Lord Rennard were prominent. Figures shown are compared with the most recent Populus poll, published at the end of last week:

    Mike Thornton (Lib Dem) 33% (n/c)
    Maria Hutchings (Conservative) 28% (n/c)
    Diane James (UKIP) 21% (n/c)
    John O’Farrell (Labour) 12% (-1%)
    Others 6%

What’s most striking is the stability in Populus’s two polls. However, the Lib Dems’ 5% lead is within the poll’s margin of error — and of course follows a Survation poll which showed the Tories ahead by 4%. To all intents and purposes, this is a dead heat contest, with the Lib Dem campaign organiser yesterday predicting that as few as 500 votes could separate the Lib Dems and Tories on Thursday.

Only one conclusion to draw from all this: it’s too tight to call! So let’s keep campaigning…

Next Friday morning will be too late. There has rarely been a more important by-election for the party.

It’s up to us whether we remember it for the right reasons or not…

Finally, it’s worth highlighting Lord Ashcroft’s concluding point on the polling methodology used by Populus:

There is an intriguing methodological footnote to this series of by-election polls. The headline voting intention figures here, as with my previous poll, are based on the assumption that 30% of those who voted Lib Dem in 2010 but now say they don’t know how they will vote, or refuse to say, will vote for the party again on Thursday, compared with 50% of don’t knows and refusers who voted Labour or Conservative at the last general election. This has been a standard assumption in my polls, and is based on reliable national data. However, it is debatable whether this holds true in a Lib Dem stronghold like Eastleigh, where the party’s support is so entrenched that it ought perhaps to be treated on the same basis as that of Labour and the Conservatives. On this assumption, the Lib Dem share increases to 34%, a 6-point lead over the Tories. Even if it is true that half of guarded or supposedly undecided voters will vote for the same party as last time, a total of 27% of Eastleigh voters remain impossible to allocate – not least because nearly half of them refuse even to say how they voted in 2010. These people could yet produce a surprise.

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from May 2007 to Jan 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Parliamentary by-elections.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.


  • “However, it is debatable whether this holds true in a Lib Dem stronghold like Eastleigh, where the party’s support is so entrenched that it ought perhaps to be treated on the same basis as that of Labour and the Conservatives.”

    Or in a by-election, where the Lib Dem door-knocking sounds to be well beyond saturation already.

    It’s remarkable that the first three parties have identical ratings to those in the last poll, which surely ought to be statistically very unlikely. Maybe it’s partly explained by large numbers of don’t knows/won’t says, who are just being allocated by formula as described above.

  • Helen Tedcastle 26th Feb '13 - 11:03am

    The UKIP vote is pivotal in my view – if their vote rises, it will hurt the Tories most – and this is a good thing for us.

    Good luck to Mike Thornton!

  • Tom Southern 26th Feb '13 - 11:55am

    UKIP’s increase may be good for us, but if it is carries on then it is very, very bad for the country. I’m very worried that no-one is a) taking them seriously or b) taking on the outright lies they peddle.

  • Tony Greaves 26th Feb '13 - 5:50pm

    Only 37% say they have had LDs at the door. I don’t know how this equates tohouseholds since lots of people are out when someone else answers the door and people don’t usually greet other members of hte family (when they get back) with “Oh I’m glad you’ve come, we had the Liberals at the door!”

    Tony Greaves

  • Tony Greaves 26th Feb '13 - 5:51pm

    And why do you think this is the last poll? What will the Mail be cooking up for Thursday morning?

    Tony Greaves

  • nvelope2003 27th Feb '13 - 1:08pm

    The unadjusted figures still give the Liberal Democrats a 5% lead but place the Conservatives just 1% above UKIP meaning the latter two parties are neck and neck so there is still the chance of a surprise
    Apparently UKIP are promising to “reduce everyones taxes” – yes EVERYONE’S ! and to reintroduce free student grants, increase the size of the military, the police and pensions and put more people in prison although they do not say where the money is supposed to come from. These are the sort of plans which have caused the present financial problems as they could only be financed by massive borrowing.

    I guess UKIP’s intending voters have either not studied these plans or do not understand how they could be financed or just want to make a by election protest against the country’s difficulties while mostly intending to return to reality at the next General Election.

  • David Allen 27th Feb '13 - 1:32pm

    The unadjusted figures are the ones to believe. The adjustment wrongly assumes that UKIP will only get the same tiny fraction of the “don’t knows” that they got last time.

  • C/Ford Resident 27th Feb '13 - 1:45pm

    Who is actually voting in this by-election? Are residents of Chandlers Ford included? I haven’t seen a voting slip.

  • Peter Watson 27th Feb '13 - 4:03pm

    “I guess UKIP’s intending voters have either not studied these plans or do not understand how they could be financed or just want to make a by election protest against the country’s difficulties while mostly intending to return to reality at the next General Election.”
    Sadly, there is a certain irony in a Lib Dem accusing UKIP of this in the context of their policy to “End the 50% university target for school leavers , scrap tuition fees and reintroduce student grants”.
    In the meantime, here are their policies on tax, etc.

  • @ Peter Watson

    I take your point but what I was trying to say was that UKIP are still putting forward such unrealistic policies. The policy statement you refer to seems to confirm this. UKIP’s policies are just as crazy as those of the other parties when in opposition. It is time for a reality check but maybe the public are not or never will be ready for this so all the political parties can be forgiven for pandering to it. Sad really.

  • Maybe if UKIP win or push the Conservatives into third place it will start a realignment of the parties on the right similar to that which occurred in the 80s on the left. There does seem to be a great feeling of disillusion with the present system, especially from the more traditional Conservatives, and a belief that the 3 main parties are virtually identical although this is probably because the options for policies are rather limited.

    Many people of all political backgrounds seem to feel we are like the defeated South after the American Civil War and that traditional Britain has Gone with the Wind but of course there does have to be change whether we like it or not, although it does depend what sort of change .

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid-1 23rd May - 1:33am
    Roland: "It’s a oath of allegiance not some aspirational mumbo jumbo." No, it is. That's exactly what it is. The problem is that you don't...
  • User AvatarTonyJ 23rd May - 1:01am
    The leak itself is bad. But what is worse is the cover-up. Sturgeon has honed in on this, and (God I hate to say it)...
  • User AvatarHannah Bettsworth 23rd May - 12:35am
    I could have written a 1, 500 word or more essay on this, as I would have loved to explain the whole historical background but...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 23rd May - 12:35am
    The full memo was published at the time ( The author wrote All of this was given on a confidential basis, so please limit any...
  • User AvatarMark Argent 23rd May - 12:29am
    Interesting distinction between transactional and transformational leadership. The hitch we have at the moment is that a transformational approach under Tim could easily feel like...
  • User AvatarCraig Morrison 23rd May - 12:11am
    I was wondering if anyone could answer a question? I was reading that by leaking the memo Alastair Carmichael had broken Westminster protocol and can't...
Sat 23rd May 2015
Sun 24th May 2015
Mon 25th May 2015
Tue 26th May 2015
Wed 27th May 2015
Thu 28th May 2015
Fri 29th May 2015
Sat 30th May 2015
Sun 31st May 2015
Mon 1st Jun 2015
Wed 3rd Jun 2015
Thu 4th Jun 2015
Sat 6th Jun 2015
Thu 11th Jun 2015
Fri 12th Jun 2015
Sat 13th Jun 2015
Wed 17th Jun 2015
Thu 18th Jun 2015