Knight: How can we get MPs to take their own fire safety more seriously?

This story would have been so appropriate on 5th November. But London Assembly member Stephen Knight took an opportunity last week to ask this question  at the meeting of the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority.

In August 2012 it was reported that another fire in the Palace of Westminster had left the House of Commons and other areas closed off, and that a report to the House of Commons Commission has apparently identified significant fire risks with boilers “ready to blow”! Is the Chairman concerned at the potential fire risks in the major London landmark – and workplace – and what steps would he like to see the Brigade take to get MPs to take fire safety more seriously?

The Chair’s reply will come as a surprise to many of us. Did you know that the Palace of Westminster (along with other Crown premises) sits outside the control of the London Fire Brigade? It even has its own fire department which is answerable directly to the Department of Communities and Local Government.

After further questions from Stephen, the Chair of the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority, James Cleverly, expressed his concerns that the Palace of Westminster only carries out its own fire inspections and said that he is now in discussions with the Department of Communities and Local Government about the London Fire Brigade taking on an enforcement role.

The House of Commons Commission report on the project to restore and renew the Palace of Westminster, revealed that the building has a number of serious fire risks. Here are some extracts:

The condition of the building impedes modern fire safety approaches and it has proved impossible so far to implement effective fire compartmentation.

Because of the fate of the old Palace of Westminster the new Palace was designed by Charles Barry with fire-proofing in mind….On the other hand a great of combustible material was used for interior decoration and the building was designed with a  ‘comprehensive network of pathways’ in the form of ventilation shafts and interior floor voids, unintentionally creating ideal conditions for fire and smoke to spread through the building.

Fortunately there have been no major outbreaks of fire in the Palace in recent years. Forty minor fires have been recorded, however, since 2008.

Stephen made this comment to Lib Dem Voice:

Many people will be shocked to learn that Parliament has exempted itself from the normal enforcement powers of London’s fire brigade over breaches of fire regulations. Staff employed in the Palace of Westminster deserve the same protection from fire as any other employee in the capital. It’s time MPs stopped believing that rules that apply to everyone else shouldn’t apply to them.

* Mary Reid is the Tuesday Editor on Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31818 for Twitter and emails.

4 Comments

  • David Allen 27th Nov '12 - 5:48pm

    “Forty minor fires have been recorded, however, since 2008.”

    Inside a building, there just ain’t no such thing as a minor fire!

  • Richard Dean 28th Nov '12 - 11:13pm

    … and even Guy Fawkes couldn’t do it with all that gunpowder! The place must blessed indeed !

  • Peter,

    You did right, but so did your Deputy Head. How much do you suppose it costs when a non-specialist thinks he has put a fire out but hasn’t? It cost tens of lives when London Underground staff thought they could cope on their own with a “minor” fire at Kings Cross, remember it?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLester Holloway 22nd Oct - 8:40am
    Caron Lindsay "Lester’s talking specifically about the AV+ system that may be on offer post election. But he doesn’t mention that we already have STV...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 22nd Oct - 8:26am
    I'm old enough to remember the anti-Whitlam coup, and being saddened that he did not feel strong enough to either abolish the governor-general or at...
  • User AvatarAlisdair McGregor 22nd Oct - 8:14am
    Nothing on Devolution, when (for once) the subject is a household topic?
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 22nd Oct - 7:59am
    "I strongly support what Julian and Gareth have said about conference and the richness of the experience. I don’t see how meeting locally deals with...
  • User AvatarTim13 22nd Oct - 7:39am
    Caracatus - I would add Davey and part-timer Laws to your list. Steve Way says that it "would be seen" as tokenism. He makes clear...
  • User AvatarChrisB 22nd Oct - 7:38am
    My point, wasn't about data access - it was specifically that the issue of tax can't be separated from legislation, corporate interests and lobbying. If...