Five of the best political adverts: Labour’s Tax Bombshell

This week we’re running a series featuring five of the most effective political adverts. Today the series finishes with the Conservative 1992 classic:

Labour’s margin of victory in 1997 was so great that it would have almost certainly won even if it had run an appalling set of adverts rather than ones of the quality of yesterday’s party political broadcast.

However, Labour’s defeat in the previous 1992 election had a lot to do with the way the Conservatives expertly attacked Labour’s economic policies via advertising, raising fears of a tax bombshell that would hit ordinary people.

As with the Australian Labor Party’s It’s Time, this was not a stand-alone advert but part of a wider communications campaign, highlighting how even the very best of political advertisements only rarely work well in a vacuum. Instead they use the creative power of an advert to tap into wider fears and hopes.

Here’s the advert:

Labour's Tax Bombshell

You can see all the posts in this series on our Political Ads page – and scroll to the bottom of that page for Luis Fishman’s classic. The stretch from 7 seconds in until 22 seconds in is fairly normal. But as for the rest…

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/22298 for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Dean 25th Oct - 4:58pm
    One of the obvious conclusions is that the approach that Paddy and his friends and the EU was keen to push didn't actually address the...
  • User AvatarGF 25th Oct - 4:53pm
    Paul in Wokingham says, "And I have little idea of what Liberal Democrats stand for. We have this anodyne message about fairer/stronger economy/society that means...
  • User AvatarPeter Andrews 25th Oct - 4:44pm
    I want regional devolution not piece meal devolution to City regions on demand which will just cause multiple 'West Lothian questions'
  • User AvatarRC 25th Oct - 4:41pm
    Another word of caution about devolution. It is likely to make even clearer than before the fact that some regions, in particularly London and the...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 25th Oct - 4:34pm
    Two main points: 1. Liberals should not allow the world to descend into violent anarchy. We need to work with our allies to do our...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 25th Oct - 4:29pm
    So no seats to defend, so no losses possible. However, the headline has to be "No losses." Is it necessary to hide the facts behind...