‘Go Home’ vans to go home

Liberal Democrats have expressed delight at the news that the notorious ‘Go Home’ vans are to be withdrawn. Home Secretary Theresa May admitted that they “not been a good idea” and were a “blunt instrument”.


Go Home Poster VanOne appalling aspect of this shameful episode is the claim by the Conservatives that they are halting the project simply because the vans were ineffective in persuading illegal immigrants to leave the country.

They still do not admit the offence that was caused to people who were legitimately in the UK; they do not recognise the implicit racism of the message; they do not understand the damage they were causing to community relations. No, they are withdrawing the vans because they did not ‘work’.

We had already learnt that the savings involved in just a handful of returnees, compared with the cost of expelling them, would have justified their existence.    The implication is that the Conservatives would have rolled out the project nationwide if just a few people had volunteered for repatriation (instead of just one), irrespective of their impact on individuals and whole communities.

 

* Mary Reid is the Tuesday Editor on Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/36877 for Twitter and emails.

5 Comments

  • Great. Now for the Immigration Bill. I do hope this headlining grabbing dismissal of a head line grabbing stunt isn’t a distraction.

  • Hooray! let’s not forget that the Advertising Standards Agency found them to be factually misleading as well, in addition to the catalogue of issues you’ve mentioned.

  • Eddie Sammon 22nd Oct '13 - 6:16pm

    I am glad that these vans are going, but I stand by my original opinion that the party overreacted to them, especially compared with our reaction to other issues.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGF 30th Jul - 6:06pm
    No-one should imagine that fracking is in any sense green. The only justification for it is security of supply and even then I'm not convinced...
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 30th Jul - 5:09pm
    I think I'm with Anthony Fairclough on this one. Well, I'm quite in favour of a codified constitution; but that's not the main issue here....
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 30th Jul - 4:32pm
    In any human endeavour there are good and bad, profesional and amateur etc. NGO's are no exception. I have a scientific background and am faced...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 30th Jul - 4:27pm
    Quoting Churchill is certainly a great example of confirmation bias in action! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
  • User AvatarAnthony Fairclough 30th Jul - 4:26pm
    Ignoring the fact that Supreme Court Justices might or might not be the 'highest qualified lawyers': you might do; but lots of people wouldn't. There's...
  • User AvatarPaul In Wokingham 30th Jul - 4:14pm
    @Simon - or as Winston Churchill said, "experts should be on tap, not on top". Confirmation bias etc etc.