Government publishes implementation plan for individual electoral registration

Cabinet Office logoThis week the Cabinet Office has published its detailed implementation plan for the introduction of individual electoral registration in England, Scotland and Wales. (Northern Ireland already uses it.)

Individual electoral registration has long been pushed for by the Electoral Commission and supported by all three of the main political parties. However, getting the details right is important as this is one of those issues where the administrative details can completely wreck the policy if got wrong.

Key elements of the plan include:

  • The move to individual electoral registration will start after the 2014 European Parliament elections.
  • “The transition will begin with the confirmation of existing electors. This means that if an elector’s name is on the electoral register when the transition begins, we will try to match their name against information held by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) on its Customer Information System. If we can match it, that entry on the register will be confirmed, the elector will be told about this and they will not need to take any further action. Evidence from piloting carried out in 2011 suggests that about two thirds of electors could be confirmed this way, but this process is being tested and refined this year to confirm how it will work in practice.”
  • “Where there is no information or some doubt about who lives at an address an ERO will ask the residents to identify who lives at that address and then invite them to apply to register individually. People will be reminded more than once and if they still do not respond, will be visited by a canvasser before a new electoral register is published in December 2014.”
  • “If you were on the register before the transition got underway, have not been confirmed on the register and have not yet applied individually, you will stay on the December 2014 register and not lose your vote at the 2015 General Election. However you will have to make a successful new application before December 2015, otherwise your name will be taken off the register.”
  • “There will be safeguards in place to ensure that only those who refuse repeated invitations can be fined, and registration officers will have to take specific steps to encourage an application before they can issue a fine.”
  • “If an elector is already on the register and has a postal or proxy vote and their details are matched against the DWP records and confirmed on the register, they will be informed and will not have to take any further action to stay on the register and keep their postal or proxy vote. If they are not matched against the DWP records, they will be informed and asked to make an individual application. If they do not do so, they will stay on the register for the 2015 General Election, but lose their postal or proxy vote.”

Individual Electoral Registration Implementation Plan

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/29506 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • “Individual electoral registration has long been pushed for by the Electoral Commission and supported by all three of the main political parties.”

    Doesn’t make it any less daft. Each individual should have a duty to ensure that ALL individuals living in their household on a given date are registered.

    Has the electoral commission ever come up with ANY sensible ideas? I thought the Coalition Government was meant to be getting rid of unnecessary bureaucracy?

  • This so-called ‘reform’ can be read as more gerrymandering of the electorate, such that the voting can be skewed in one way or another. Compare boundary changes, which Cameron has quite openly stated will move in favour of his party.
    There is no other advantage to the electorate of individual registration, so the advantage must be for many of the MPs somehow. Please try convincing me that this is not true.
    Afterall, my MP agrees with me.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 1st Mar - 7:08pm
    @Stuart "Have you already forgotten about this morning’s Yogov poll showing two thirds of the public back Labour’s plans?" When was that poll taken as...
  • User AvatarMartin 1st Mar - 7:01pm
    stuart moran: Where I am with you is in the depressing conclusion that a principle of education for all funded by the public purse has...
  • User AvatarStuart 1st Mar - 6:34pm
    A risk, but for who? I don't mind if the pensioners want to risk their own financial security. I do mind if the risk is...
  • User AvatarTim13 1st Mar - 6:31pm
    Michael Taylor Can you never stop being an apologist?
  • User AvatarStuart 1st Mar - 6:26pm
    @Simon I just thought it was a really strange question. It seems clear to me that Scheme B is better for low paid graduates /...
  • User AvatarNick Barlow 1st Mar - 6:24pm
    Oh, and some interesting reaction from a Labour MP here, suggesting that they're not comfortable with the current process either http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2015/02/real-devolution-has-come-public-consent-not-whitehall-diktat
Sun 1st Mar 2015
Mon 2nd Mar 2015
18:30
Wed 4th Mar 2015
Sat 7th Mar 2015
Sun 8th Mar 2015
Wed 11th Mar 2015
Fri 13th Mar 2015
Sat 14th Mar 2015
Wed 18th Mar 2015
Sat 28th Mar 2015