Government shifts to back full range of medical care for rape victims in armed conflict

Lindsay NorthoverWelcome news from the House of Lords last week, where Lib Dem peer and government spokesperson for International Development, Lindsay Northover, for the first time said the British government believes that girls and women raped in armed conflict are protected under international humanitarian law, even when domestic law in the country in question says something else.

What that means in practice is that the UK government is willing to fund the full range of medical care for the victims, including abortion where medically necessary – even if domestic law in that country says abortion is illegal in all circumstances. It also means that in future all recipients of UK humanitarian aid money will need to use that money in line with this policy.

Deciding when international law should trump domestic law is always a tricky matter. In this case, it means that the UK government believes victims of horrific crimes during armed conflict can and should get the full range of medical treatment they need – and those are just the sorts of situations which international law exists for, where international human rights standards can and should be dominant.

It is a good decision.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Cooper 8th Feb - 9:43am
    @Ruth Bright Ruth, you are right. The diversity debate is a spat between Roedean and Eton, or their ilk. Working class men don't even get...
  • User AvatarRuth Bright 8th Feb - 9:23am
    The idea that this has polarised into a spat between privileged girlies and put upon working class men is truly daft. All of us are...
  • User AvatarTim13 8th Feb - 8:41am
    Keith Legg The point you make - regular review of mechanisms - was the reason zipping was phased out for Eurocandidates. The broader points made...
  • User AvatarDavid Cooper 8th Feb - 8:35am
    @William Summers Thank you William, I could not agree more. The equality and diversity debate seems to have degenerated into a spat between the privately...
  • User AvatarAmina Jamal 8th Feb - 8:34am
    I am an approved candidate and stood in the Westminster campaign in 2015. I did not fail to be elected because of my gender, or...
  • User AvatarRob 8th Feb - 8:20am
    The point seems to have been totally missed that the reason the Canadian Liberals have a "wonderfully diverse parliamentary group" is because they WON a...