Government shifts to back full range of medical care for rape victims in armed conflict

Lindsay NorthoverWelcome news from the House of Lords last week, where Lib Dem peer and government spokesperson for International Development, Lindsay Northover, for the first time said the British government believes that girls and women raped in armed conflict are protected under international humanitarian law, even when domestic law in the country in question says something else.

What that means in practice is that the UK government is willing to fund the full range of medical care for the victims, including abortion where medically necessary – even if domestic law in that country says abortion is illegal in all circumstances. It also means that in future all recipients of UK humanitarian aid money will need to use that money in line with this policy.

Deciding when international law should trump domestic law is always a tricky matter. In this case, it means that the UK government believes victims of horrific crimes during armed conflict can and should get the full range of medical treatment they need – and those are just the sorts of situations which international law exists for, where international human rights standards can and should be dominant.

It is a good decision.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32644 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 29th Aug - 5:48am
    I would be interested to know if Joe thinks we should be basing our policies towards say immigration and assylum seekers on similar electoral studies?
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 29th Aug - 5:43am
    Are we really arguing that it is valid to base a future strategy on a few questions asked of a small cohort of the remnant...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 29th Aug - 4:08am
    The notion that the two-chamber system in use in the United States is "a recipe for conflict, delay and political impasse " is mistaken. The...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 29th Aug - 12:46am
    People should be chosen on merit not gender or race. It is not liberal to discriminate on gender or race.
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 29th Aug - 12:31am
    "Aspirational (Scots) with a social conscience". "Radical centre". These are sad old politician words. These are a Lib Dem equivalent of Burnhamspeak. Burnham speaks of...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 29th Aug - 12:22am
    Poetic justice, or injustice? Vince Cable and Danny Alexander, finally treated as equals!