Government shifts to back full range of medical care for rape victims in armed conflict

Lindsay NorthoverWelcome news from the House of Lords last week, where Lib Dem peer and government spokesperson for International Development, Lindsay Northover, for the first time said the British government believes that girls and women raped in armed conflict are protected under international humanitarian law, even when domestic law in the country in question says something else.

What that means in practice is that the UK government is willing to fund the full range of medical care for the victims, including abortion where medically necessary – even if domestic law in that country says abortion is illegal in all circumstances. It also means that in future all recipients of UK humanitarian aid money will need to use that money in line with this policy.

Deciding when international law should trump domestic law is always a tricky matter. In this case, it means that the UK government believes victims of horrific crimes during armed conflict can and should get the full range of medical treatment they need – and those are just the sorts of situations which international law exists for, where international human rights standards can and should be dominant.

It is a good decision.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32644 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 31st Jul - 6:27pm
    Can someone explain quite why a crossroad was so controversial? Presumably there are not 46 councillors for the area with/without a crossroad?
  • User AvatarPeter Hayes 31st Jul - 6:14pm
    Jennie, what I was saying we need to go back to the grass roots and regroup. We have done it before and as a minority...
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 31st Jul - 6:14pm
    Allan/Matthew Huntbach - Just to be clear, I'm not getting at you here. If you had a choice of being born at any stage in...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 31st Jul - 6:12pm
    @T-J Perhaps you could identify a LibDem "success" first!
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 31st Jul - 6:12pm
    Daniel Henry - ‘Rightly we keep raising the bar and pushing for better, but I think it would be naive to dismiss all the work...
  • User AvatarT-J 31st Jul - 6:09pm
    Richard Dean If the Lib Dem successes on LGBT rights are down to the work of other people, name them. Whose coattails are we supposedly...