Government shifts to back full range of medical care for rape victims in armed conflict

Lindsay NorthoverWelcome news from the House of Lords last week, where Lib Dem peer and government spokesperson for International Development, Lindsay Northover, for the first time said the British government believes that girls and women raped in armed conflict are protected under international humanitarian law, even when domestic law in the country in question says something else.

What that means in practice is that the UK government is willing to fund the full range of medical care for the victims, including abortion where medically necessary – even if domestic law in that country says abortion is illegal in all circumstances. It also means that in future all recipients of UK humanitarian aid money will need to use that money in line with this policy.

Deciding when international law should trump domestic law is always a tricky matter. In this case, it means that the UK government believes victims of horrific crimes during armed conflict can and should get the full range of medical treatment they need – and those are just the sorts of situations which international law exists for, where international human rights standards can and should be dominant.

It is a good decision.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 20th Jan - 1:00am
    @ matt I note you have responded to my facts with your beliefs. I can only state the facts and hope they will change your...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 20th Jan - 12:31am
    Duncan Brack, please tell ordinary members like myself more about how the Federal Policy Committee decides on topics for Federal Conference. I am rather confused....
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 20th Jan - 12:19am
    Final comment on the polling. There really is some interesting conclusions in the detailed numbers. Despite support for the negotiating objectives, people think leaving the...
  • User AvatarDavid Pocock 20th Jan - 12:17am
    I'm glad to see it is being taken seriously. I feel the party has the right principles in this area; for way too long the...
  • User AvatarJennie Rigg 20th Jan - 12:12am
    Thanks for that diplomatic response, Duncan. I'm glad to see that LDV has corrected the spelling errors that were in earlier drafts of this report...
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 20th Jan - 12:08am
    On the post May speech, YouGov polling, I would have expected initial support and a bounce. The speech was well delivered, I think there was...