Government shifts to back full range of medical care for rape victims in armed conflict

Lindsay NorthoverWelcome news from the House of Lords last week, where Lib Dem peer and government spokesperson for International Development, Lindsay Northover, for the first time said the British government believes that girls and women raped in armed conflict are protected under international humanitarian law, even when domestic law in the country in question says something else.

What that means in practice is that the UK government is willing to fund the full range of medical care for the victims, including abortion where medically necessary – even if domestic law in that country says abortion is illegal in all circumstances. It also means that in future all recipients of UK humanitarian aid money will need to use that money in line with this policy.

Deciding when international law should trump domestic law is always a tricky matter. In this case, it means that the UK government believes victims of horrific crimes during armed conflict can and should get the full range of medical treatment they need – and those are just the sorts of situations which international law exists for, where international human rights standards can and should be dominant.

It is a good decision.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32644 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRC 21st Aug - 6:58pm
    Sounds like he's indulging in a heady mix of wishful thinking and opportunism on a wide range of issues. The risks and unknowns for iScotland...
  • User AvatarPsi 21st Aug - 6:39pm
    Tim13 "Thatcherite / Reaganite is not a lazy shorthand. It is direct and specific, certainly the way I use it." So what is this specific...
  • User AvatarMark Platt 21st Aug - 6:29pm
    I hope Lady P reads these comments, here are mine. Dear Pauline, you should never be a token, you should never sit at the back,...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 21st Aug - 5:57pm
    "If only we were turning people away from being on local party executives. In the real world many local parties are struggling to get people...
  • User AvatarJoeBourke 21st Aug - 5:38pm
    jedibeeftrix, the conclusion to the Royal Society Report, while acknowledging the uncertainties that exist around the estimates of the magnitude and regional variation of climate...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 21st Aug - 5:36pm
    @Simon McGrath Have you considered the chicken and the egg? In the real world, maybe it's the evident gender imbalance that is the reason why...