Government shifts to back full range of medical care for rape victims in armed conflict

Lindsay NorthoverWelcome news from the House of Lords last week, where Lib Dem peer and government spokesperson for International Development, Lindsay Northover, for the first time said the British government believes that girls and women raped in armed conflict are protected under international humanitarian law, even when domestic law in the country in question says something else.

What that means in practice is that the UK government is willing to fund the full range of medical care for the victims, including abortion where medically necessary – even if domestic law in that country says abortion is illegal in all circumstances. It also means that in future all recipients of UK humanitarian aid money will need to use that money in line with this policy.

Deciding when international law should trump domestic law is always a tricky matter. In this case, it means that the UK government believes victims of horrific crimes during armed conflict can and should get the full range of medical treatment they need – and those are just the sorts of situations which international law exists for, where international human rights standards can and should be dominant.

It is a good decision.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.


Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Watson 4th Oct - 5:44pm
    @John Marriott I think you are conflating "going into coalition", which many people supported (however reluctantly) since it is silly to support a minor party...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 4th Oct - 4:57pm
    If you believe in PR as I do, then, unless you live in Scotland, or had lived in West Germany between 1956 and 1959, it...
  • User AvatarCllr Mark Wright 4th Oct - 4:43pm
    @Siobhan - You seen to be saying that Scotland shouldn't get on and do what it *can* do, until it is given the powers to...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 4th Oct - 4:18pm
    "What is it about Labour?" Well, it's that there are quite a lot of rather nasty people in local politics. Many are Labour, many are...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 4th Oct - 4:00pm
    I don't agree with all of "the west's" foreign policy that was meant to say. Sorry, predictive text.
  • User AvatarTonyJ 4th Oct - 3:57pm
    Jeez. You can never beat our Paddy when it comes to an anecdote about someone, can you??! :)