Government shifts to back full range of medical care for rape victims in armed conflict

Lindsay NorthoverWelcome news from the House of Lords last week, where Lib Dem peer and government spokesperson for International Development, Lindsay Northover, for the first time said the British government believes that girls and women raped in armed conflict are protected under international humanitarian law, even when domestic law in the country in question says something else.

What that means in practice is that the UK government is willing to fund the full range of medical care for the victims, including abortion where medically necessary – even if domestic law in that country says abortion is illegal in all circumstances. It also means that in future all recipients of UK humanitarian aid money will need to use that money in line with this policy.

Deciding when international law should trump domestic law is always a tricky matter. In this case, it means that the UK government believes victims of horrific crimes during armed conflict can and should get the full range of medical treatment they need – and those are just the sorts of situations which international law exists for, where international human rights standards can and should be dominant.

It is a good decision.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32644 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDav 23rd Oct - 6:24pm
    Where the supplier’s income is derived from such transactions, both taxes are effectively taxes on income. No, the other way around. It's not a tax...
  • User AvatarPaul Howden 23rd Oct - 5:56pm
    Whilst I'm not naive enough to believe the misconception that teachers only work 9-3 and have 25 weeks holiday a year I don't think teachers...
  • User AvatarCllr. David Becket 23rd Oct - 5:56pm
    We have an opportunity to reconnect with the public on the NHS issue, possibly our only opportunity before April. We are ahead of the other...
  • User Avatarg 23rd Oct - 5:54pm
    Interestingly there is no criticism of the Tory NHS reforms in this piece, despite them acknowledging they have proven to be an expensive mistake. Only...
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 23rd Oct - 5:07pm
    Except that the choice is not between renewables and fracking. its between imported gas and coal and fracking.
  • User AvatarAngela Davies 23rd Oct - 4:15pm
    Matthew Huntback misses the point. The right to protest should be sancrosant in a democracy. It matters not if you agree with the objectives of...