Government shifts to back full range of medical care for rape victims in armed conflict

Lindsay NorthoverWelcome news from the House of Lords last week, where Lib Dem peer and government spokesperson for International Development, Lindsay Northover, for the first time said the British government believes that girls and women raped in armed conflict are protected under international humanitarian law, even when domestic law in the country in question says something else.

What that means in practice is that the UK government is willing to fund the full range of medical care for the victims, including abortion where medically necessary – even if domestic law in that country says abortion is illegal in all circumstances. It also means that in future all recipients of UK humanitarian aid money will need to use that money in line with this policy.

Deciding when international law should trump domestic law is always a tricky matter. In this case, it means that the UK government believes victims of horrific crimes during armed conflict can and should get the full range of medical treatment they need – and those are just the sorts of situations which international law exists for, where international human rights standards can and should be dominant.

It is a good decision.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evans 22nd Oct - 1:33am
    @Paul Barker - I fear you are reading a bit more into my post than is called for when you say "its common practise to...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 22nd Oct - 12:44am
    @ James “free movement of Labour is untenable for a progressive party” (sic). It is a great shame we can’t consider if free movement of...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 22nd Oct - 12:05am
    @ Paul Barker “I have to say that I dont get this 26 Seats business” Newshound provided this figure. He/She should justify this figure. Our...
  • User Avatarmalc 21st Oct - 11:28pm
    During the referendum campaign most - if not all - of the leading "brexiteers" said that anyone already in the UK should be allowed to...
  • User Avatarfrankie 21st Oct - 10:37pm
    El Sid "I was initially in favour of staying in the EU but the campaign persuaded me to vote leave." I rather doubt that given...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 21st Oct - 10:32pm
    @DavidEvans. On this site its common practise to read someones comment before you criticise it. The 34 MPs figure has been widely quoted but it...