Grand Duke loses Royal veto as euthanasia bill approved

Via The Guardian came the news this week that:

Luxembourg’s parliament … moved to curtail the powers of the country’s monarch, Grand Duke Henri, after he refused to sign a euthanasia bill into law.

The 60-member legislature voted 56-0, with one abstention, to amend the constitution so that bills will no longer require Henri’s approval before passing into law. The vote avoided a constitutional crisis and cleared the way for Henri to “promulgate” – or formally announce – the euthanasia and assisted-suicide bill after it gets final legislative approval on December 18…

The law makes euthanasia and assisted suicide possible after at least two doctors have been consulted. Other than Luxembourg, which has a population of 480,000, three countries have legalised euthanasia: the Netherlands, Belgium and Colombia.

On December 2 Grand Duke Henri, who is a Roman Catholic, told the prime minister, Jean-Claude Juncker, that he could not sign the euthanasia bill. The parliament had approved the bill in a first reading on February 18 by a vote of 30-26.

Henri, 53, agreed to amend the constitution to end a standoff between him and the government.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • ’60-member legislature voted 56-0, with one abstention’ Is it me or does the arithmetic in that statement not add up?

  • robert j. phelan, PhD 26th Dec '08 - 7:41pm

    It is shocking how easily a nation’s “Constitution” can be so drastically altered! If the people of Luxembourg are so keen on abortion and assisted suicide, why did they not want to join the Third Reich as a section of Mosseland? What did Gen Patton die for?

  • Isabel Miller 10th Mar '10 - 9:06am

    Those who are afraid that assisted suicide/euthanasia would be abused by relatives wanting to inherit might like to consider that people with less than £10,000 could take advantage of such a humane law. Because I think that those at greater risk are those with greater wealth but £10,000 – no, I don’t think that could be a problem?
    Finally, a way out of this world governed by vanity and greed for those (e.g. me) who have comparatively little to lose by dying early when one feels that one’s life has been ‘completed’.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    A clear, credible, principled strategy from the Yorkists! Makes a welcome change. Sadly, followed by twenty below-the-line posts, providing nearly twenty ve...
  • Simon McGrath
    so we get a permanant increase in costs for these subsidies based on ( alleged ) windfall profits. Its another big increase in spending -how is it to be paid ...
  • Peter Davies
    @Kira CollinsThat assumes we want to help people more with their energy bills than with all the other bills they may be struggling with. There is no reason why ...
  • Rob Heale
    Agree that we need to focus on strategy and have clearer messaging:- 1. We MUST prioritise membership recruitment in all we do, including PPB's, most leaflets...
  • Kira Collins
    Disappointed. The most obvious means of reducing energy bills is to remove VAT. Relatively straightforward to do and does not adversely impact on the attractive...