<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grant Shapps: another history lesson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26379</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26379</guid>
		<description>Chris Paul - I wouldn&#039;t try to be so angelic about this.  Labour&#039;s record in running dirty campaigns is probably worse than most.

I have a copy of a document called &#039;Beating the Liberals&#039; written by Labour campaign staff.

In it they give the following advice:

&#039;Find one flaw and smear them all.  Go negative until swamped by complaints.  Then do it again.&#039;

Glass houses and all that eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Paul &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t try to be so angelic about this.  Labour&#8217;s record in running dirty campaigns is probably worse than most.</p>
<p>I have a copy of a document called &#8216;Beating the Liberals&#8217; written by Labour campaign staff.</p>
<p>In it they give the following advice:</p>
<p>&#8216;Find one flaw and smear them all.  Go negative until swamped by complaints.  Then do it again.&#8217;</p>
<p>Glass houses and all that eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hywel Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26349</link>
		<dc:creator>Hywel Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26349</guid>
		<description>Chris - you said (in your blog posting)

&quot;The dirty, despicable etc Tories copied every word from dirty, despicable etc Lib Dem leaflets procured from Labour friends!&quot;

Seems to suggest that Labour were passing Lib Dem leaflets onto the Tories with the hope/suggestion that they would use similar techniques.

Is it standard Labour party practice to advise the Tories on running better election campaigns now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; you said (in your blog posting)</p>
<p>&#8220;The dirty, despicable etc Tories copied every word from dirty, despicable etc Lib Dem leaflets procured from Labour friends!&#8221;</p>
<p>Seems to suggest that Labour were passing Lib Dem leaflets onto the Tories with the hope/suggestion that they would use similar techniques.</p>
<p>Is it standard Labour party practice to advise the Tories on running better election campaigns now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26267</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26267</guid>
		<description>Chris Keating: Have you &lt;i&gt;read&lt;/a&gt; my post? It is of course related to Mark&#039;s post. It starts by crediting his exclusive vs Grant Schweppes and then discusses an aspect of the Cheadle campaign - which Mark raised. Have I linked to the wrong post?

And did you read my comment? I said above that my post DID NOT cover the need for the by-election line.

Hywel Morgan: I don&#039;t think Labour did much in Cheadle for themselves never mind for other parties. 

But I do think it is the case that the Tories had hold of some choice Labour attacking leaflets from another election P&amp;P&#039;d by Lib Dems and that they copied them. They&#039;d have been able to get hold of them themselves though wouldn&#039;t they??

I know I&#039;ve got reams of opposition leaflets in my files and parroting lines back is old news really.

I&#039;m even wondering now if I linked to the wrong post? But no. Chris Keating it seems cannot read. Mark has posted a comment that there was a Tory leaflet implying a rape which I did not know about. So I&#039;ve added an update. And asked if it is archived. If so I&#039;d like to blog about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Keating: Have you <i>read my post? It is of course related to Mark&#8217;s post. It starts by crediting his exclusive vs Grant Schweppes and then discusses an aspect of the Cheadle campaign &#8211; which Mark raised. Have I linked to the wrong post?</p>
<p>And did you read my comment? I said above that my post DID NOT cover the need for the by-election line.</p>
<p>Hywel Morgan: I don&#8217;t think Labour did much in Cheadle for themselves never mind for other parties. </p>
<p>But I do think it is the case that the Tories had hold of some choice Labour attacking leaflets from another election P&amp;P&#8217;d by Lib Dems and that they copied them. They&#8217;d have been able to get hold of them themselves though wouldn&#8217;t they??</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;ve got reams of opposition leaflets in my files and parroting lines back is old news really.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m even wondering now if I linked to the wrong post? But no. Chris Keating it seems cannot read. Mark has posted a comment that there was a Tory leaflet implying a rape which I did not know about. So I&#8217;ve added an update. And asked if it is archived. If so I&#8217;d like to blog about it.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Keating</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26247</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Keating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26247</guid>
		<description>Chris P, your post actually has nothing at all to do with Mark&#039;s post or the anonymous comment. 

So I&#039;d just like to mention &lt;a href=&quot;http://clickeral.blogspot.com/2007/05/have-nice-holiday-dont-get-flogged.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; random blog post which I made several months ago. 

PS. Aren&#039;t kittens lovely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris P, your post actually has nothing at all to do with Mark&#8217;s post or the anonymous comment. </p>
<p>So I&#8217;d just like to mention <a href="http://clickeral.blogspot.com/2007/05/have-nice-holiday-dont-get-flogged.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> random blog post which I made several months ago. </p>
<p>PS. Aren&#8217;t kittens lovely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random LD</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26244</link>
		<dc:creator>Random LD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26244</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t by-elections normally happen when an MP dies in office? Are you suggesting that Chris Rennard should just appoint MPs without the formality of an election?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t by-elections normally happen when an MP dies in office? Are you suggesting that Chris Rennard should just appoint MPs without the formality of an election?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hywel Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26228</link>
		<dc:creator>Hywel Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26228</guid>
		<description>So Labour were helping the Tory campaign in Cheadle then were they Chris...

Patsy&#039;s health was hardly a secret at the 2005 election and her vote when up 6.5% so I don&#039;t think it was an issue locally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Labour were helping the Tory campaign in Cheadle then were they Chris&#8230;</p>
<p>Patsy&#8217;s health was hardly a secret at the 2005 election and her vote when up 6.5% so I don&#8217;t think it was an issue locally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26218</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26218</guid>
		<description>Most of us are plagued by these anons NB. I had one over at my site at 2 am using two different names and just being plain rude. This one is at least making a point I suppose. 

LDV could take it down. But Mark is in a glass house lobbing bricks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of us are plagued by these anons NB. I had one over at my site at 2 am using two different names and just being plain rude. This one is at least making a point I suppose. </p>
<p>LDV could take it down. But Mark is in a glass house lobbing bricks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norfolk Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26215</link>
		<dc:creator>Norfolk Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26215</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you always find that the people with the most offensice things to say are always anonymous ?

Simply pathetic. Come on &quot;Name Withheld&quot;, be brave enough to stand behind your own words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you always find that the people with the most offensice things to say are always anonymous ?</p>
<p>Simply pathetic. Come on &#8220;Name Withheld&#8221;, be brave enough to stand behind your own words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26205</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26205</guid>
		<description>I have blogged this story and a bit more about Cheadle &lt;a href=&quot;http://chrispaul-labouroflove.blogspot.com/2007/08/libdemologists-voice-grant-shapps-at-it.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; but not an explanation for the by-election taking place at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have blogged this story and a bit more about Cheadle <a href="http://chrispaul-labouroflove.blogspot.com/2007/08/libdemologists-voice-grant-shapps-at-it.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> but not an explanation for the by-election taking place at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name withheld</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26194</link>
		<dc:creator>Name withheld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/grant-shapps-2-1114.html#comment-26194</guid>
		<description>Perhaps while you are having another rant you could explain why there &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; a by-election in Cheadle 2005? It may seem hard-faced to say it but there was absolutely no need for it ... or at least the benefits did not accrue to the people of Cheadle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps while you are having another rant you could explain why there <i>was</i> a by-election in Cheadle 2005? It may seem hard-faced to say it but there was absolutely no need for it &#8230; or at least the benefits did not accrue to the people of Cheadle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

