Has Gordon Brown been making up numbers?

The Full Fact website reports:

For two weeks now Full Fact has been trying to find out the basis of Gordon Brown’s claim that 300,000 businesses in the UK have been provided with direct cash-flow help from the Government.

In a piece published on 4 March, Full Fact examined the claim made by the Prime Minister in a speech to the Welsh Labour party. Despite numerous requests, emails and phone calls neither BIS, HMRC, Downing Street, The Treasury nor the Labour party were able to say where the figures came from.

But with Mr Brown again using the claim during yesterday’s PMQs, Full Fact has revisited the investigation, but to no avail.

Despite assurances our request was being looked into, there has been no response from the Labour party. Downing Street insisted it was a matter for the Treasury. The Treasury press team, apparently now questioning the need to respond to requests from online media outlets, insisted this was not a press inquiry and referred us to the ever-engaged public inquiry line.

So nearly two weeks, and a helluva lot of phone calls later, we are no nearer to an explanation. Our search for the facts behind the figure is not over, we are determined to provide you with the information. Stay tuned for the next update.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • 300 000 does seem a suspiciously large number to have received direct cash flow help from the government. It did strike me as a bit unlikely when I heard it during PMQs

  • Chris Stanbra 19th Mar '10 - 8:11am

    Might be related to the help with business rates that the government has given where a proportion of the increase has been deferred. Its very small sums though and still works out at around 450 businesses per constituency.

  • Re Chris’ comment. It might also include deals providing for deferred VAT payments.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    A clear, credible, principled strategy from the Yorkists! Makes a welcome change. Sadly, followed by twenty below-the-line posts, providing nearly twenty ve...
  • Simon McGrath
    so we get a permanant increase in costs for these subsidies based on ( alleged ) windfall profits. Its another big increase in spending -how is it to be paid ...
  • Peter Davies
    @Kira CollinsThat assumes we want to help people more with their energy bills than with all the other bills they may be struggling with. There is no reason why ...
  • Rob Heale
    Agree that we need to focus on strategy and have clearer messaging:- 1. We MUST prioritise membership recruitment in all we do, including PPB's, most leaflets...
  • Kira Collins
    Disappointed. The most obvious means of reducing energy bills is to remove VAT. Relatively straightforward to do and does not adversely impact on the attractive...