Have your say on MPs’ expenses

The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority is running a public consultation on MPs’ expenses, to run from 7 January to 11 February 2010.

The IPSA was created by the Parliamentary Standards Act 2009, in response to last summer’s public outcry at MPs’ expenses and allowances claims under the existing scheme. The body is independent of Parliament, Government and political parties.

Respond online or in writing with your views on a new scheme for MPs’ expenses.

The topics it covers include:

There’s also the chance to make further suggestions and to comment on the proposals’ impact on “the diversity of representation in the House of Commons.”

The results of the public consultation will be used “to inform the content of the expenses scheme, which will be laid before Parliament before the general election if it is called in May or June 2010.”

Visit the MPs’ expenses consultation website here.

The 19 questions took me about a quarter of an hour to answer – why not submit your views this lunchtime?

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Malcolm Todd 8th Jan '10 - 12:49pm

    You managed that in 15 minutes? Hats off to you.

  • Completed the online survey. I must say in general the proposals seem quite good and generally reflect my own thoughts on Expenses

  • Anthony Aloysius St 8th Jan '10 - 4:36pm

    “The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority is running a public consultation on MPs’ expenses, to run from 7 January to 11 February 2010.”

    What’s the point? The final decision will still be made by MPs, won’t it? What do they care what the public thinks, once they’re elected?

  • Andrew Tennant 8th Jan '10 - 4:57pm

    Done, and yes, the proposals are more on the public side than I anticipated or they had previously been trailed to be.

  • @Anthony, The final decision will be made by the IPSA hence the word Independent in its title

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 27th Aug - 8:58am
    @grahame lamb 'The train-operating companies are in the private sector so why is tax-payers money being transferred to them.' Government gives tax-payers' money to an...
  • User AvatarPeter Kemp 27th Aug - 8:51am
    PS I was on the beach in Cannes in June, woman wearing all manner of clothes, bikinis, T-shirts/shorts, one piece swim suits ... what they...
  • User AvatarPeter Kemp 27th Aug - 8:49am
    In response to JamesG above ... yes, maybe some Muslim woman are forced to wear clothes they do not want to wear. This would be...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 27th Aug - 8:33am
    @Stevan Rose ' Manchester Airports Group is a fantastic success story for public investment returning profit to local councils but competing with and beating private...
  • User Avatargrahame lamb 27th Aug - 8:28am
    The train-operating companies are in the private sector so why is tax-payers money being transferred to them. Is the tax-payer to be asked to subsidise...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 27th Aug - 8:22am
    One of the problems with wholesale nationalisation of the railways is that it would apply the same processes to those parts of the industry that...