Help people searching for advice on cervical cancer jab

Last week, when I was writing Daily View hours later than I should, I linked to Mark Pack’s piece linking to Malcolm Cole’s piece about Google search results about the cervical cancer jab. Caron Lindsay has also written about this.

Last week, Malcolm Cole was warning that those worried about the cancer jab being given to teenage girls were getting misleading and inaccurate advice if they ran an internet search for more information.

Scary stories have legs, and it’s still the case, a week later, that if you search for information on this story, the leading results are the stories in the Daily Mail and other tabloids erroneously linking the tragic death of a schoolgirl with the vaccine she’d received hours earlier.

The difference between a causal link and an unfortunate coincidence is best highlighted by this satirical article on a slightly rude website “News Arse”: Panic spreads as hundreds die after reading Daily Mail.

It’s probably true that every day, tens or hundreds of Daily Mail readers die. It’s not remotely true that the Daily Mail causes the deaths. It is true that one young person has died shortly after receiving the HPV jab. It’s not true that the jab was in any way linked to her death. And yet thanks to scaremongering from tabloid newspapers and other news outlets, the idea that the HPV jab is implicated in a death will persist in people’s minds. And anyone who searches the internet at the moment to try and clear up this issue for themselves will currently only see the false information by the tabloids, and not the legitimate, researched-based information from the NHS.

So if you have written about the issue yourself, or if you plan to do so in the future, please don’t link to the stories in the irresponsible press. But do link to the pages on the NHS websites that have the real story.

Clear instructions on how to do this are all to be found in Malcolm Cole’s post.

UPDATE: I thought this was important when I wrote it over lunch time – since then, I’ve been pointed at a survey by Ofcom.

The latest study by regulatory body Ofcom, shows that children aged between 12 and 15, believe Google’s search engine ranks websites by truthfulness, rather than relevance or random selection.

Results from the study show that 32 per cent of children support the idea that Google displays search results by the most truthful website first. While 37 per cent of children are aware that the search engine revelas the most relevant site first.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Online politics.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/16446 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 8th Oct '09 - 7:07pm

    It’s not remotely true that the Daily Mail causes the deaths.

    I dunno. We could attribute them as partially responsible for all the people who were reading a newspaper while crossing the street, and walked into heavy traffic.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Most Read




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Dean 23rd Oct - 9:32am
    The "central point" of this article has been challenged by a number of commentators, so I don't see why Rabi should complain that it hasn't....
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 23rd Oct - 9:29am
    When we review the party constitution next year (first I heard of it, maybe because I was entitled to go to Glasgow and vote, but...
  • User Avatarrobert sayer 23rd Oct - 9:26am
    John Dunn. ignores the outlandish and brazen misinformation expressed by some in his party(including its leader) and attempts to sanitize it But as I said...
  • User AvatarRichard Fagence 23rd Oct - 9:21am
    I usually agree with the remarks made by Helen Tadcastle but, on this occasion, I'm afraid we have to disagree. I shall be casting my...
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 23rd Oct - 9:18am
    There are some important perceptions here, and I speak as someone who was out in the constituency most days. What we need to do, though,...
  • User AvatarJohn Kelly 23rd Oct - 9:01am
    What's the date of the conference and where is it being held?