Hey ho, it’s another Parliamentary election by AV coming our way

Clearly tis the season to do elections by AV because in addition to a new member of the Lords being elected by the alternative vote at the moment (postal ballot papers went out during the week), there is now another AV election on its way.

Baroness Hayman has announced she will be stepping down as Speaker in the Lords in July. Her replacement will be elected by the alternative vote, just as she was in 2006. The Lords isn’t unusual in using preferential or multi-round elections in this respect, because the Speaker in the Commons is elected over multiple rounds whilst the Commons deputy speakers are elected by the alternative vote.

Once again we’ve got a case of Parliamentarians having chosen to use AV for their own procedures and yet those very Parliamentarians who now tell us there are principled reasons why AV is wrong in general (not just arguments specific to general elections) were remarkably quiet when it came to choosing what election system they get to use to elect others.

It’s good enough for them to elect other people but not for us to elect them it would appear. Not exactly the strident principled stand they like to paint their views as being.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/23975 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • David Boothroyd 30th Apr '11 - 1:24pm

    As I understand it Baroness Hayman has yet to state whether she will be standing for re-election.

  • Tut tut Mark, you should be proud of them.

    Before the ERS became partisan I believe that they stated that AV was good for voting for a single position (e.g. a speaker, party leader etc), but not suitable for the election of a representative body.

    So there they are doing as your Society recommended and then you lambast them, eeeeh – who’d be a politician.

  • Blimey. Yet another post on AV making an ad hominem attack on its opponents rather than arguing the issues.

    No wonder the electorate is unimpressed.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Dixon 21st Nov - 3:45am
    @JimHughes We don't know but if you could get odds on it not being the case I would put down your house on it. The...
  • User AvatarExiled Scot 21st Nov - 12:34am
    So it looks like we are going to come well down the list of also rans, behind a dominatrix. The party is being dismissed as...
  • User AvatarRoland 21st Nov - 12:20am
    >What I am simply arguing for is transparency and clear principles in free trade. From the leaked draft and the circumstances surrounding its negotiation, you...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 21st Nov - 12:13am
    William Hobhouse It takes confidence to be an entrepreneur. There’s no financial security. It needs a particular a state of mind, a restlessness and inventiveness...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 20th Nov - 11:40pm
    One of the things our Government has done for small businesses is to eliminate or heavily reduce business rates at the bottom end. This has...
  • User AvatarMBoy 20th Nov - 11:40pm
    @Jim Barnes - of course that's not even remotely true. ISDS relates to governments that break existing contracts.