How election leaflets used to look: Doncaster 1950

Previously I’ve dug out a City of London Alderman election leaflet from the 1930s which showed how many of the message in election leaflets have stayed the same over the decades, even if the presentation has changed massively.

This time I’ve dug out a single-sided leaflet from Doncaster in 1950, for Labour MP Ray Gunter who was moving seat from Essex to northern England following the redrawing of boundaries.

It is typical of a style of leaflet that last for many years after women were first given* the right to vote in Parliamentary elections – from the wife of a candidate to the women voters in a constituency, taking as its implicit message, ‘You and I might not know about the politics men get up to, but we know there are other things that matter too…’.

An explicit appeal from a partner is now a rarity, though there are faint echoes of it in the popularity now of endorsements for a candidate from people who are well known in an area or experts in a particular field.

Doncaster election leaflet, 1950 general election

* Or, strictly speaking, restored the right to vote, as there is scattered thin evidence that women very occasionally voted in Parliamentary elections prior to 1832.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/23122 for Twitter and emails.

4 Comments

  • ‘An explicit appeal from a partner is now a rarity,’

    I don’t think that’s true – Sarah Brown for one. Fion Hague for another. Samantha Cameron has not exactly kept out of the media either.

    More generally – the more interesting question is if the internet had been around in 1950 (or at another time) what would the comments and ‘narrative’ of internet commentary be? I would suggest that Clem Attlee would have been a hate figure like no other. But what would the internet have made of Suez, the EEC referendum, Jeremy Thorpe, the Miners Strike? Of course, one can not apply the standards of today to the past, but it makes for an interesting counterfactual.

  • Tony Greaves 23rd Feb '11 - 3:34pm

    I think people should actually read Elsie Gunter’s message and ponder the changed political environment rather than the medium of communication.

    Tony Greaves

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLester Holloway 22nd Oct - 8:40am
    Caron Lindsay "Lester’s talking specifically about the AV+ system that may be on offer post election. But he doesn’t mention that we already have STV...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 22nd Oct - 8:26am
    I'm old enough to remember the anti-Whitlam coup, and being saddened that he did not feel strong enough to either abolish the governor-general or at...
  • User AvatarAlisdair McGregor 22nd Oct - 8:14am
    Nothing on Devolution, when (for once) the subject is a household topic?
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 22nd Oct - 7:59am
    "I strongly support what Julian and Gareth have said about conference and the richness of the experience. I don’t see how meeting locally deals with...
  • User AvatarTim13 22nd Oct - 7:39am
    Caracatus - I would add Davey and part-timer Laws to your list. Steve Way says that it "would be seen" as tokenism. He makes clear...
  • User AvatarChrisB 22nd Oct - 7:38am
    My point, wasn't about data access - it was specifically that the issue of tax can't be separated from legislation, corporate interests and lobbying. If...