How ID card data ended up in the wrong places

The Coalition Government’s detailed planning to destroy most of the IT infrastructure and data for ID cards, following the decision to axe Labour’s ID cards plans, has revealed disturbing news about how data was mishandled.

As the BBC reports, equipment is having to be destroyed because it looks like data was wrongly stored on it:

Destruction of [some] equipment might have been avoided if the data it collected had been stored centrally as it was meant to be. But there is evidence that some was accidentally stored locally, the document reveals, so off to the dump it must go…

However, other data which it was promised would not be stored centrally did end up being stored in just that way:

Anti-ID card campaigners often warned about the dangers of storing all of the ID data in one place – making it potentially vulnerable to hacking, only to be assured by ministers from the previous government that this would not happen.

So it is fascinating to read that there are two separate locations in the UK where all of the biometric and biographical information gathered by the ID card scheme is, or has been, stored.

Although Labour’s ID cards plans may be in the political – and soon technological – graveyards, this news – which has only come to light because of the detailed organisation for ending ID cards plans – leaves us an important lesson for the future. Regardless of public promises made about how data will be stored and safeguarded, reality often turns out differently. No security is perfect; no staff list is impervious to wayward staff; no technological plan is resistant to change and modification.

That is why the very acts of deciding not to gather some data, or not to collate different sources into one place, is so often an important firebreak that protects our privacy.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • I understand the coalition will legislate in order to have access to our bank accounts and will bring the information together so that it can be jointly accessed by both HMRC and the DWP. That suggests it would be all be stored in one place. However, if the information is then downloaded by functions of HMRC and DWP, I presume they would also store the information locally.

  • Yes, I too was about to mention the coalition’s wish to hold the financial details of just about every individual, on a central database. Now when the LibDems trumpeted the scrapping of Contact Point , the child protection database, it was said that the information was ‘locally; available, but the problem LibDems had was with it being held on one giant database. So why the sudden change of tact? The deficit maybe?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTorrin Wilkins 24th Jul - 11:31pm
    Eddie Sammon: Thank-you, I feel that sadly a lot of people have tried to guess what ideology I belong to just through my anti-EU stance....
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 24th Jul - 11:12pm
    Brexiters should still be welcome in the Lib Dems, as long as they have broadly liberals principles. It's nearly always bad to say one policy...
  • User AvatarTorrin Wilkins 24th Jul - 11:10pm
    Lorenzo Cherin: Thank-you! :)
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 24th Jul - 11:06pm
    It is very good , that , as a minority view in our party , that a Brexiter has shown the most engagement and best...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 24th Jul - 11:06pm
    John King is suffering from the five stages of grief suffered by those who have a loss. The five stages of denial, anger, bargaining, depression...
  • User AvatarTorrin Wilkins 24th Jul - 11:01pm
    frankie: "I see no point in dictating to my descendants how the world should be...". We will end up either dictating that the UK is...