How leaflets used to look: Labour’s Citizen leaflet from 1929

Today’s leaflet in my series on old election leaflets is a centrally produced Labour party 4-pager from 1929. As with the Conservative leaflet from 1931 which I previously featured, the design may be very different from good modern leaflets, but the content has some very familiar overtones.

The May 1929 contest was the first general election in which women under 30 could vote and also one of only three elections in the modern era where the party with the most votes did not also win the most seats. Despite being slightly out-polled by the Conservatives, Labour won more seats in what was a hung Parliament. That was a massive anti-Conservative swing from the previous election, caused in large part by the very grim economic backdrop. There was also a modest revival for David Lloyd George’s ‘We Can Conquer Unemployment’ Liberal Party.

Following the election, Labour formed a minority government, one that was subsequently to be much attacked by opponents for its economic record.

Despite the “June 1929” date on the front page, the leaflet’s contents make clear that is actually from the May 1929 contest. and much of it could have been written today, such as Labour’s attack on the Tories: “The Tories have helped the rich at the expense of the poor”, “The Tories do not care what happens to the unemployed” and “[The Tories] reduced the Supertax on large incomes by £10,000,000 a year”.

There is even a reference to tax and £10,000… save that in the 1929 incarnation £10,000 is a very rich person so that time round Labour was attacking help for those earning £10,000 as being help for the rich. (Mind you, the complexity of the argument in the left-hand column of p.2 on this point is such that I doubt the attack had much of an impact on anyone.) Issues such as housing, pensions, schools and help for “the small income tax payer” all feature, reminding us that the core issues of British politics show an awful lot of continuity.

That Ramsay MacDonald and Labour devoted all of page 3 to ‘we’re not extremists, honest’ is also a pretty big clue as to what one of the most frequent and most effective attacks on the party at the time was.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • I like the design! (with the exception of the underlining on the last page).

  • Plus ca change… The Tories don’t change, do they? They’re still persecuting and exploiting the poor and indulging and rewarding their wealthy chums!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 28th Feb - 1:54am
    We had a chance to call for and build alliances to reform the EU into a pro-people institution rather than a pro-business or pro-globalisation institution....
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 28th Feb - 1:38am
    Thanks, Ed Thornley, for your enthusiasm for our constituency! It's good to read the differing viewpoints above, and, thanks to Peter Watson, the detailed voter...
  • User AvatarConor McGovern 28th Feb - 1:18am
    David Evans, I agree. We must never, ever again settle for being a small-c conservative party.
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 28th Feb - 1:02am
    Peter and Mike, I love the way you both keep on demanding detailed answers to what Lib Dems offer practically, to fulfill our Preamble ideals...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 28th Feb - 12:33am
    Conor, We had done all that you suggest for over forty years, building our party up from nearly nothing to get up to 57 MPs...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 27th Feb - 11:10pm
    "in Copeland our vote has snuck above ten percent only twice; in 2005 and 2010" According to the Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copeland_(UK_Parliament_constituency): 2001 10.7% 1983 15.9%...