How leaflets used to look: a Tory attack on Labour’s economic policies, 1931

Today’s leaflet in my series on old election leaflets is a centrally produced Conservative Party leaflet from October 1931. Ramsay MacDonald had led a Labour administration under August 1931 when it split over a Budget and economic crisis. MacDonald earned his place in Labour’s hall of infamy by then forming a National Government with Conservatives and Liberals. Only two Labour colleagues joined MacDonald in this government, so the attacks in this leaflet on “Arthur Henderson and other Socialist ex-Ministers” are, nominally at least, directed at Labour rather than MacDonald and co. in the coalition.

Swap references such as the Empire Marketing Board for current ones and the basic arguments being made in the leaflet are remarkably similar to contemporary politics:

For some other historical comparisons between election campaigns then and now see my article Continuity and change in election campaigns: the 1910 and 2010 election campaigns.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/29118 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

6 Comments

  • You could write a near-identical leaflet attacking Labour over the economy today.

  • This did a smile to my face; nothing changes.

  • LondonLiberal 4th Jul '12 - 4:10pm

    same s**t, different day…

  • Old Codger Chris 7th Jul '12 - 5:12pm

    @Simon Banks
    Sorry to be picky but most Liberal MPs initially supported the National Government and benefitted from an electoral pact, although many later moved into opposition leaving behind the so-called National Liberals aka Tories. Quite right to say that the effect was much more devastating for Liberals than for Labour.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarexpats 18th Apr - 1:59pm
    Sadie Smith 18th Apr '15 - 12:53pm .......I get a touch fed up with easy come easy go supporters and members....... It's the 'easy come,...
  • User AvatarIain 18th Apr - 1:55pm
    Moore is an excellent politician, and one I would be sad to lose. The Ashcroft poll for him showed him within the MOE of winning,...
  • User AvatarThomas Robinson 18th Apr - 1:50pm
    I like Michael Moore. BUT yet again the Lib Dems showed a mastery of political misjudgement by replacing him with Carmichael who ironically, I think...
  • User AvatarBolano 18th Apr - 1:45pm
    Realistically, the problem with squeezing the Labour vote in Scotland is that out of the three (Labour, Lib Dems & Tories) the Labour voters are...
  • User AvatarThomas Robinson 18th Apr - 1:38pm
    George Flaxman. I don't care who you have excluded (though Andrew R may)-but anyone who compares Scotland 2015 to Germany of the 1930s is, at...
  • User AvatarDavid 18th Apr - 1:37pm
    "the party isn't asking it's own supporters to vote tactically"... C'mon you can't have that sort of thing one way. Or do you honestly not...
Sat 25th Apr 2015