How leaflets used to look: a Tory attack on Labour’s economic policies, 1931

Today’s leaflet in my series on old election leaflets is a centrally produced Conservative Party leaflet from October 1931. Ramsay MacDonald had led a Labour administration under August 1931 when it split over a Budget and economic crisis. MacDonald earned his place in Labour’s hall of infamy by then forming a National Government with Conservatives and Liberals. Only two Labour colleagues joined MacDonald in this government, so the attacks in this leaflet on “Arthur Henderson and other Socialist ex-Ministers” are, nominally at least, directed at Labour rather than MacDonald and co. in the coalition.

Swap references such as the Empire Marketing Board for current ones and the basic arguments being made in the leaflet are remarkably similar to contemporary politics:

For some other historical comparisons between election campaigns then and now see my article Continuity and change in election campaigns: the 1910 and 2010 election campaigns.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/29118 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

6 Comments

  • You could write a near-identical leaflet attacking Labour over the economy today.

  • This did a smile to my face; nothing changes.

  • LondonLiberal 4th Jul '12 - 4:10pm

    same s**t, different day…

  • Old Codger Chris 7th Jul '12 - 5:12pm

    @Simon Banks
    Sorry to be picky but most Liberal MPs initially supported the National Government and benefitted from an electoral pact, although many later moved into opposition leaving behind the so-called National Liberals aka Tories. Quite right to say that the effect was much more devastating for Liberals than for Labour.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 26th Nov - 2:45pm
    I dislike the term 'benefit tourism', because it implies that large numbers of immigrants come to the UK to exploit the welfare system rather than...
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 26th Nov - 2:27pm
    They look very similar. Are they by any chance related? Shurely shome mishtake.
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 26th Nov - 2:24pm
    Roland: Since this country grew rich on the proceeds of the slave trade (admittedly the slaves weren't immigrants, unless you count them as immigrants to...
  • User AvatarPaul In Wokingham 26th Nov - 1:56pm
    The latest Ashcroft poll reports Lib Dem support in England at 6%, compared with 24% at the 2010 GE. Now it is undoubtedly the case...
  • User AvatarGraham Martin-Royle 26th Nov - 1:56pm
    Way back in the 1970's my brother decided to use the free movement principles to try his luck working in Germany. He had no job...
  • User AvatarPeter Hayes 26th Nov - 1:52pm
    If they do monitor I hope they are better at it than Google. My other half is interested in the history of art. Google keeps...