How leaflets used to look: Clapham 1955

Continuing my occasional series on how election leaflets used to look, this one is a Labour freepost election address from the 1955 general election in Clapham constituency.

The front of the leaflet is a design unlikely to be used today:

Labour election leaflet, Clapham, 1955 (front)

Dated too is the right-hand side of the inside, with its appeal from the candidate’s wife to female voters –¬†a common tactic at the time.¬†Despite the old-fashioned typography, the layout is clear and easy to read thanks to the good use of white space and strong headings – a lesson that many modern literature writers forget. Note also the talk of having helped 3,000 people as an MP over the previous five years – a fraction of what many MPs now do.

Labour election leaflet, Clapham, 1955 (inside)

The back of the leaflet contains a reminder of the task that used to take up large amounts of time for political helpers – handwriting the name and address on election freepost leaflets.

Labour election leaflet, Clapham, 1955 (back)

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/23124 for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

  • Matthew Harris 16th Mar '11 - 3:30pm

    And Mr Gibson held the seat in 1955, only to lose it in 1959, beaten by a Tory whose name rings no bells for me, who was in turn beaten in 64 by a Labour candidate of whom I had never heard. Just goes to show how historically anonymous many MPs are. I wonder what Mr Gibson did during World War One? His CV on the leaflet makes no mention of those years, making me wonder if he might not have been a conscientious objector? Who knows.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStephen Campbell 1st Oct - 12:58pm
    @John Roffey & @Matthew Huntbach are entirely correct in their assessment of corporate power. Many multinational corporations do indeed hold more power than many nation...
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 1st Oct - 12:56pm
    At least some 71 UK teachers are researching why Chinese children do better than British children. See https://www.ncetm.org.uk/news/45671 There will also be an exchange between...
  • User AvatarRC 1st Oct - 12:49pm
    "What you say about the NE economy would turn people (sorry, already has turned people) there against us, not in favour." Why? "The direction of...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 1st Oct - 12:21pm
    David A - it's a bit of jump to infer that I am saying everyone is right. In fact I think people who are better...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 1st Oct - 12:15pm
    The clever right-wing trick is to take some old-style radical liberal language from past times, such as "the stifling hand of Whitehall", and traduce it....
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 1st Oct - 12:13pm
    @ Kelly-Marie Blundell Matt has pointed out why the coalition has effectively ended [apart from perhaps supporting a few measures agreed to in the past]....