How not to respond to a planning objection

  1. You are concerned about a planning application in your road.
  2. You decide to send an email to the Chair and Vice Chair of the Planning Committee, outlining your objections.
  3. You turn on delivery and read receipts on your email so you can be sure your objections have got through.
  4. You send the email.
  5. You get an automated response back from one of them saying, “Your message was deleted without being read”.

Oh dear. That was the recent experience of former Barnet councillor Jonathan Davies (Lib Dem). Both the councillors he emailed are Conservative.

Share this story with your friends:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LibDig
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/1221 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

5 Comments

  • Posted 24th August 2007 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    I’m sure it’s probably more common than one might think – spam filters and so on.

  • Posted 24th August 2007 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    Careful, I can read emails of up to 300 words without opening them and often delete such emails once read. If the sender has set their email for a receipt they will receive a message saying it had been deleted unread.

  • Matthew Scott
    Posted 24th August 2007 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    Had the application gone to a planning committee, the Chairman and Vice Chairman would have been prejudiced if they had read it

  • Posted 24th August 2007 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    3.Utter rubbish

  • Angus Huck
    Posted 25th August 2007 at 12:29 am | Permalink

    Ward councillors and planning committee members should never destroy correspondence relating to planning applications. To do so constitutes a dereliction of their duty. Read AND file.

    I simply don’t understand No 3.

    How can knowledge prejudice the Chairman and Vice Chairman? Are they brainless idiots incapable of coming to a reasoned judgment? Are all councillors on planning committees merely zombies there to listen politely to the spin of officers and rubber stamp recommendations in total and blissful ignorance? Like the Labour councillors in Manchester claim they do? Sounds like the Soviet Union.

    Councillors are elected to uphold the public interest. Those who close their ears to constituents, or are officers’ poodles, should be voted out of office.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

LibDemVoice Election Appeal

Liberal Democrat Voice is an independent, collaborative website run by Liberal Democrat activists, where any individual inside or outside the party can express their views. Views expressed on this website are those of the individuals who express them and may not reflect those of the party.

Poll

Do you think we should abolish ‘politically restricted’ posts and allow public officials to become openly active in support of political parties if they want to?
View Results

Categories

Recent Posts