How to solve the US’s economic problems: tax breaks for wooden arrows

Section 503 of the bail out bill voted on by the US Senate was this gem:

EXEMPTION FROM EXCISE TAX FOR CERTAIN WOODEN ARROWS DESIGNED FOR USE BY CHILDREN.

I know you want the details, so here they are:

‘‘(B) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN WOODEN
4 ARROW SHAFTS.—Subparagraph (A) shall not
5 apply to any shaft consisting of all natural
6 wood with no laminations or artificial means of
7 enhancing the spine of such shaft (whether sold
8 separately or incorporated as part of a finished
9 or unfinished product) of a type used in the
10 manufacture of any arrow which after its as11
sembly—
12 ‘‘(i) measures 5⁄16 of an inch or less in
13 diameter, and
14 ‘‘(ii) is not suitable for use with a bow
15 described in paragraph (1)(A).’’.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/4597 for Twitter and emails.

7 Comments

  • Yeah, good spot Mark. Good spot.

  • David Heigham 2nd Oct '08 - 12:38pm

    Of its extraordinary kind,and even if it had been attached to a less transcendental piece of legislation, this is a rare gem.

  • Apparently all the pork barrell nonsense and uncosted tax cuts put on the Senate has so pissed of some House Democrats it may be even less likley to pass than before.

  • Hywel Morgan 3rd Oct '08 - 12:55am

    We know Mark’s read that bit. Have the House members? Remember this is the body which passed the PATRIOT Act without noticing that several significant amendments had been removed by the Senate overnight. (This is one reason why I repeatedly bang on about MPs not doing their job in scrutinising legislation)

  • Any idea who was particularly into tax relief on arrow shafts and way. Is it a niche industry in a crucial swing town somewhere/

  • Peter Chivall 12th Jan '12 - 11:02am

    …and the Anglo-Saxon business world and populist politicians criticise the EU for bureaucracy!!!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAllan 21st Aug - 8:58pm
    Perhaps John thinks that iScotland may give him a better chance of being elected, I sincerely hope the Scottish remain with us not because they...
  • User AvatarNorman Fraser 21st Aug - 8:50pm
    I actually think it's pretty clear why John has decided to vote Yes. Like many Scots he has looked at what the current coalition government...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 21st Aug - 8:35pm
    I hardly put it past the English population to support a whole raft of regressive, vengeful anti-Scottish measures if the Yes vote should win (which,...
  • User AvatarTim13 21st Aug - 8:28pm
    Psi No need to resort to sarcasm! I was trying to draw in a few words a summary of what I meant by it. I...
  • User AvatarLiberal Neil 21st Aug - 8:05pm
    I think John's argument is a reasonable one, and more honest and coherent than the Yes campaign's.
  • User AvatarJohn Barrett 21st Aug - 7:58pm
    Alex - One of the reasons I did not submit the article to Lib-Dem voice was exactly because I feared that might happen.