How to turn a contradictory comment into a media quote

Start with this pair of sentences:

Policing isn’t about communicating with people. It’s about communicating with people.

That would be a pretty daft instant contradiction, wouldn’t it?

But wait. Let’s say “PR” instead of “communicating”. Because PR = boo! bad! nothing to do with communicating!

Policing isn’t about PR. It’s about communicating with people.

Doesn’t quite work, does it? So let’s throw in something about the nasty internet:

Policing isn’t about PR and fancy websites. It’s about communicating with people.

Ah, that’s better. Second sentence is still a bit contradictory though. So let’s add in something about cutting crime. Cutting crime and communicating aren’t contradictory of course, but it might just hide the meaning a bit…

Policing isn’t about PR and fancy websites. It’s about keeping people safe and communicating with people.

One final touch, let’s change that communicating bit:

Policing isn’t about PR and fancy websites. It’s about keeping people safe and reassuring the public.

And voila. Let’s hope no-one reading that thinks, “Hang on a minute. The public keep on telling researchers they are more reassured the more they know about what the police are doing in their area. So surely reassuring people is about PR and that pair of sentences doesn’t add up?”

Because that would just make it sound like we’ve gone for the easy jibe the media will love and to hell what boring stuff like the evidence that communicating with people does reassure them.

And that of course is something the Taxpayers’ Alliance would never do, isn’t it?

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Mark Wallace 14th Feb '10 - 9:48am

    Boxing straw men is always so much easier, isn’t it? You conveniently failed to mention that the activityyoure defending, which you appear to reckon is the type of PR which will “reassure” the public was erm a blog purporting to be written by a police dog.

    Further your whole argument rests on the weird idea that when we say “reassuring the public”, we can only mean through PR- when in fact the evidence is clear that as the police have spent more and more on PR and comms, public trust in them has gone down. This assumption that the public would feel better if only a press officer told then to more often is absurd, and I’m sorry to see you repeating it. In actual fact, the police can best reassure the public by – ooh let’s see – reducing crime?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 28th Sep - 11:23pm
    Simon Shaw - fair comment, and I seem to remember hearing Tim say Corbyn wouldn't talk to him. But there are ways and ways of...
  • User AvatarDavid Becket 28th Sep - 11:13pm
    Tim Farron needs to cut back on his general attack on Corbyn. Some of Corbyn's policies we can agree with, at least in part. however...
  • User AvatarDave Orbison 28th Sep - 11:03pm
    Tim Hill - re the stuck needle. Very mature and you think the problem lies with Momentum?
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 28th Sep - 10:53pm
    Tim Hill Corbyn is 21st century digital socialism. There is no Labour needle anymore - apparently.
  • User AvatarThomas Shakespeare 28th Sep - 10:48pm
    Hi Stuart, I don't expect us to overtake Labour, but we can make significant gains. I think link in 2015 on the day leadership ratings...
  • User AvatarAlistair 28th Sep - 10:27pm
    Trump will lose because he has alienated overweight people and in particular overweight women.