Hussein-Ece and Brinton on stalking, under-representation of women and gender-based violence

November 25th saw the UN’s International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. This occasion was marked by a debate in the House of Lords last Thursday.

Just reading the Hansard account of the debate made me feel sick. There was a former surgeon describe the hours of surgery it took to reconstruct one woman’s face after a violent attack by her partner. There were descriptions of how girls as young as 12 were subjected to Female Genital Mutilation in this country despite laws against it. Where is the worst place in the world to be a woman? Reputedly a province in the Democratic Republic of Congo where 40 women are raped every day. In India, 50% of men and women believe that wife-beating is justified if a woman disrespects her in-laws or neglects the house.

Two Liberal Democrat peers spoke in the Debate. Sal Brinton wrote for Liberal Democrat Voice in 2008 about the awful campaign of intimidation and harassment inflicted on her and other Watford Liberal Democrats by Ian Oakley. In the week the new Anti-Stalking law came into force, she talked about what that would mean for people who had been in her situation:

I give my personal thanks to all Ministers who supported this legislation as it progressed through Parliament, and particularly to Lynne Featherstone, who made it a priority to champion the fight against violence against women in any form. It remains essential that we hear the voices of the victims and assess the risks to them. An anti-stalking law is only as effective as those who enforce it. The culture change proposed in the new law may take a while to implement, but I am sure that now we have a tool that can give women peace of mind and safety from the persistent nightmare of stalkers.

Meral Hussein-Ece made some very important points about the underlying culture. Having laws giving women rights is one thing, but if men still dominate the law enforcement organisations, these laws are unlikely to be implemented as well as they could be. She recounted how she  had been threatened for trying to help women:

 Recently, a high-profile, educated woman from the Indian sub-continent told me of an incident where a senior official casually in conversation talked of how when he beat his wife, she knew what she had done wrong. This is by no means an unusual attitude and is not necessarily confined to poorer communities. I experienced threats of violence myself some years ago, when I set up the first project and centre to support Turkish and Kurdish women who experienced violence in the UK, from the very men who perpetrated that violence against women and their family behind closed doors, or who, often in the name of their so-called honour, which, as we all know, is dishonour, tried to control women by using violent methods.

Having laws in place is not enough. We need those laws to be properly implemented. We know that legislatures and enforcement authorities are usually dominated by men who often do not see this issue as a priority. We must do better to protect women and prevent this pervasive human rights violation.

She went on to add that we hadn’t quite got it right in the UK yet either, citing media portrayal of women and its consequences:

Here in the UK, we are still working hard to eliminate and educate people in our society to change behaviour and attitudes, but according to the NSPCC sadly one in three teenage girls experience sexual violence from their boyfriends. We need to look at how women are being portrayed in some sections of the media, particularly in online sites.

If you ever wondered why I go on about this stuff as much as I do, the transcript of the debate will give you a good idea. Every day women are beaten, raped, mutilated or killed, denied education and denied their equal right to power and participation in government. That’s not a situation we should tolerate, either here or internationally.

The Independent on Sunday’s  Christmas appeal this year is in aid of Refuge, a charity which supports women and children who have been through domestic violence. Yesterday actor Sir Patrick Stewart told of his experience of having to protect his mother from his violent father. A few newspaper articles and a debate on a Thursday evening alone won’t change things for the many women whose lives are made intolerable. It will take sustained national and international effort for many years to come. Everyone involved in politics should be working towards the aim of eliminating violence against women.

* Caron Lindsay is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31924 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

  • Great post Caron. I will read the debate with interest. As you know, I am Director of Rosa – the UK Fund for Women and Girls. Much of our work has involved tackling violence against women and girls – from body image projects to challenge the perception of girls in the media, to being part of a wider initiative to tackle Female Genital Mutilation in the UK. Whilst many people believe that the battle for equality of the sexes has been won, the accounts you have set out above, and the work done by the organisations Rosa funds indicates that there is a still a very long way to go before women and girls in the UK are safe from violence.

  • Miranda Whitehead 4th Dec '12 - 8:06am

    Thank you Caron. This needs to be said, and said again, because people find it hard to believe that such casual violence against women and girls is still going on nationally and internationally. The work done by Sal Brinton, Merel Hussein-Ece , Lynne Featherstone and Jo Swinson shows that despite the small numbers of Liberal Democrat women in Parliament we can still make our voices heard.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 24th Apr - 2:48pm
    Jeremy Browne He wanted to ‘open up the independent schools Much of the comment on this line is based on the belief that local authorities...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 24th Apr - 2:44pm
    @Raddiy You might like to look at the list of member countries of NATO. You might even recognize some of them (a majority) as European...
  • User AvatarTim 24th Apr - 2:42pm
    > security against military threats Try telling the Ukrainians that. > opportunities for beneficial trade > future expanding markets > consequential employment and economic development...
  • User AvatarGareth Epps 24th Apr - 2:41pm
    Jeremy, are you saying that I should not use the review copy sent to Liberator to review your book?
  • User AvatarCharles Rothwell 24th Apr - 2:38pm
    Why on earth does Clegg not make more frequent reference to the recent (November 2013) CBI Report on "Our Global Future" which, while certainly making...
  • User AvatarRaddiy 24th Apr - 2:36pm
    @ Richard Dean Since your first example is completely wrong, it is barely worth giving any credence to the rest of your list. NATO maintains...