Hussein-Ece and Brinton on stalking, under-representation of women and gender-based violence

November 25th saw the UN’s International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. This occasion was marked by a debate in the House of Lords last Thursday.

Just reading the Hansard account of the debate made me feel sick. There was a former surgeon describe the hours of surgery it took to reconstruct one woman’s face after a violent attack by her partner. There were descriptions of how girls as young as 12 were subjected to Female Genital Mutilation in this country despite laws against it. Where is the worst place in the world to be a woman? Reputedly a province in the Democratic Republic of Congo where 40 women are raped every day. In India, 50% of men and women believe that wife-beating is justified if a woman disrespects her in-laws or neglects the house.

Two Liberal Democrat peers spoke in the Debate. Sal Brinton wrote for Liberal Democrat Voice in 2008 about the awful campaign of intimidation and harassment inflicted on her and other Watford Liberal Democrats by Ian Oakley. In the week the new Anti-Stalking law came into force, she talked about what that would mean for people who had been in her situation:

I give my personal thanks to all Ministers who supported this legislation as it progressed through Parliament, and particularly to Lynne Featherstone, who made it a priority to champion the fight against violence against women in any form. It remains essential that we hear the voices of the victims and assess the risks to them. An anti-stalking law is only as effective as those who enforce it. The culture change proposed in the new law may take a while to implement, but I am sure that now we have a tool that can give women peace of mind and safety from the persistent nightmare of stalkers.

Meral Hussein-Ece made some very important points about the underlying culture. Having laws giving women rights is one thing, but if men still dominate the law enforcement organisations, these laws are unlikely to be implemented as well as they could be. She recounted how she  had been threatened for trying to help women:

 Recently, a high-profile, educated woman from the Indian sub-continent told me of an incident where a senior official casually in conversation talked of how when he beat his wife, she knew what she had done wrong. This is by no means an unusual attitude and is not necessarily confined to poorer communities. I experienced threats of violence myself some years ago, when I set up the first project and centre to support Turkish and Kurdish women who experienced violence in the UK, from the very men who perpetrated that violence against women and their family behind closed doors, or who, often in the name of their so-called honour, which, as we all know, is dishonour, tried to control women by using violent methods.

Having laws in place is not enough. We need those laws to be properly implemented. We know that legislatures and enforcement authorities are usually dominated by men who often do not see this issue as a priority. We must do better to protect women and prevent this pervasive human rights violation.

She went on to add that we hadn’t quite got it right in the UK yet either, citing media portrayal of women and its consequences:

Here in the UK, we are still working hard to eliminate and educate people in our society to change behaviour and attitudes, but according to the NSPCC sadly one in three teenage girls experience sexual violence from their boyfriends. We need to look at how women are being portrayed in some sections of the media, particularly in online sites.

If you ever wondered why I go on about this stuff as much as I do, the transcript of the debate will give you a good idea. Every day women are beaten, raped, mutilated or killed, denied education and denied their equal right to power and participation in government. That’s not a situation we should tolerate, either here or internationally.

The Independent on Sunday’s  Christmas appeal this year is in aid of Refuge, a charity which supports women and children who have been through domestic violence. Yesterday actor Sir Patrick Stewart told of his experience of having to protect his mother from his violent father. A few newspaper articles and a debate on a Thursday evening alone won’t change things for the many women whose lives are made intolerable. It will take sustained national and international effort for many years to come. Everyone involved in politics should be working towards the aim of eliminating violence against women.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31924 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Great post Caron. I will read the debate with interest. As you know, I am Director of Rosa – the UK Fund for Women and Girls. Much of our work has involved tackling violence against women and girls – from body image projects to challenge the perception of girls in the media, to being part of a wider initiative to tackle Female Genital Mutilation in the UK. Whilst many people believe that the battle for equality of the sexes has been won, the accounts you have set out above, and the work done by the organisations Rosa funds indicates that there is a still a very long way to go before women and girls in the UK are safe from violence.

  • Miranda Whitehead 4th Dec '12 - 8:06am

    Thank you Caron. This needs to be said, and said again, because people find it hard to believe that such casual violence against women and girls is still going on nationally and internationally. The work done by Sal Brinton, Merel Hussein-Ece , Lynne Featherstone and Jo Swinson shows that despite the small numbers of Liberal Democrat women in Parliament we can still make our voices heard.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarpeter tyzack 29th May - 11:08am
    to quote the Tory argument 'what can be more fair than the one that gets the most votes wins'? well we are not in an...
  • User AvatarGwynfor Tyley 29th May - 11:00am
    An addendum: Strange as it might sound, we should take courage from the rise of UKIP. They have demonstrated that you do not need MPs...
  • User AvatarGwynfor Tyley 29th May - 10:55am
    Great article and great suggestion from Michael Kilpatrick. We do not need to accept the conventions and we should fight what we believe is right....
  • User AvatarMavarine Du-Marie 29th May - 10:45am
    I didn't know any of them (past or present) until they became leaders of their parties. So I don't think that should be the bases...
  • User AvatarTCO 29th May - 10:42am
    @Alun Williams do we? @malc - not just decent but prepared to put his head above the parapet too.
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 29th May - 10:41am
    Me nice greed environment Hmm, Freudian slip maybe, but I meant "green".
Fri 29th May 2015
19:30
Sat 30th May 2015
Sun 31st May 2015
Mon 1st Jun 2015
Tue 2nd Jun 2015
Wed 3rd Jun 2015
Thu 4th Jun 2015
Fri 5th Jun 2015
Sat 6th Jun 2015
Mon 8th Jun 2015
19:30
Tue 9th Jun 2015
Wed 10th Jun 2015
Thu 11th Jun 2015
Fri 12th Jun 2015
Sat 13th Jun 2015
Wed 17th Jun 2015
Thu 18th Jun 2015
Sat 20th Jun 2015
Sun 21st Jun 2015
Thu 25th Jun 2015