Ian Swales MP writes…The crucial role of education in a manufacturing revival

The Lib Dem Spring Conference will debate the motion: Creating a strong manufacturing sector in a stronger economy. Part 3 of the motion calls for: ‘Government to continue its commitment to apprenticeships, and, additionally, to promote science education in schools and science and engineering degrees at universities – these are essential for building the skills sets necessary to support a strong manufacturing sector.’

Science and engineering education is an issue close to my heart as I actually graduated with a degree in chemical engineering from Manchester University.  My science based degree opened up many doors to me, leading to a career with ICI, in which I held a wide variety of financial and business management roles around the world.

This government believes that if we want the UK to remain a world leader in research and technology, we need a future generation that is passionate about science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM).  Effective science teaching in schools is therefore essential, both for ensuring a satisfactory degree of scientific literacy in society at large, and for equipping the next generation of scientists and engineers to progress into higher education and beyond.  This Government has to do more to encourage science graduates to enter the teaching profession, as there remains a shortage of STEM teachers.

As well as a commitment to science education in our schools and universities, this Government is dedicated to encouraging young people to take up apprenticeships.  Participation in training schemes makes a lasting difference for young people, and supports efforts to stimulate economic growth and improve social mobility.

The Coalition has already introduced a number of policies that are helping young people find jobs, apprenticeships and work experience. With more than 665,000 apprentices in training last year, there is no doubt that apprenticeships are an increasingly important part of the country’s response to bringing forward a strong economic recovery.  Research shows that apprenticeships are a key way of training and developing workers for the future, helping businesses to secure a supply of high quality people with skills they need to boost productivity.

Whenever I speak to local manufacturing businesses in my area, a lack of trained workers remains a frequent concern. I welcome the excellent schemes that this Government has introduced to ensure our workforce has the necessary skills to compete in an ever-globalising job market.  We have a massive shortage of engineering skills in this country, and therefore we need to do even more to support manufacturing, exports and infrastructure, through investment in scientific education and apprenticeships.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Helen Tedcastle 7th Mar '13 - 2:21pm

    @ Ian Swales MP: ” Effective science teaching in schools is therefore essential, both for ensuring a satisfactory degree of scientific literacy in society at large, and for equipping the next generation of scientists and engineers to progress into higher education and beyond. This Government has to do more to encourage science graduates to enter the teaching profession, as there remains a shortage of STEM teachers.”

    I agree that science teaching has to be effective but successive Governments have thrown money at science in schools – since 1988 – science trainees have very generous bursaries (more than other shortage subjects), their performance and leadership incentives again, are greater than in all other subjects; science is supported more by this Government than any other subject apart from Latin and MFL; it has very generous curriculum time as it has been a core subject since 1988 – and this is still not enough!

    As other subjects continue to be starved of cash, teacher training places, resources etc… while science is generously treated, it is clear that many children are just not turned on by a subject which saturates their school days – perhaps less is more?

  • Stephen Donnelly 7th Mar '13 - 9:10pm

    This is good, sensible stuff. The danger is that rather than fund existing infrastructure (schools, universities) the government invents new Quangos and sees its money spent on special pleading, or syphoned off by property developers and middle men.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMike S 8th Dec - 12:11am
    @Tim13 Tim, I can only speak for myself here. I believe the Psyche of many people who voted leave in areas such as these is...
  • User AvatarTim13 8th Dec - 12:03am
    Road - testing a theory which has gradually developed in my thoughts over this, the issue of "cake and eat it", and the idea that...
  • User AvatarAndy Hinton 8th Dec - 12:01am
    Tom Brake was a teller for the opponents, I believe.
  • User AvatarAndy Hinton 7th Dec - 11:57pm
    Elizabeth: so what should the choices in a referendum on the deal be? Accept the deal or default to a WTO-rules-only cliff edge when the...
  • User Avatarmatt 7th Dec - 11:54pm
    was their a whip on this vote? Tom Brake abstained on the lisbon treaty referendum motion in 2007 against the party whip. Tom was on...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 7th Dec - 11:40pm
    The four Lib Dem rebels appear to be Normal Lamb, Thomas Brake (interesting one), Greg Mulholland and John Pugh.