In praise of people with drawn curtains in the morning

Night time workers. Work at night, sleep at day. That’s not being a scrounger. Shame so many Conservatives and so-called populists crudely label them all as scroungers with their blunderbuss rhetoric for having the temerity to draw the curtains at home when they’re sleeping after a long session at work.

UPDATE: In other curtain commentary news… Jennie has highlighted in the comments her own post. Here’s the link to it; the comments are well worth a read for a mix of the serious and the very funny. And here’s an Olympian who left their curtains shut.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32022 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

21 Comments

  • What is it with governments and people who close their curtains in the morning? Though I suppose being called a scrounger by a Tory is a step up from being accused of terrorism by Labour.

  • Liberal Neil 8th Dec '12 - 10:45am

    We often keep our curtains drawn in very cold weather as it helps keep the heat in.

  • Well let’s be honest, The Tories will never get the concept of people who have their curtains drawn. They live in expensive homes with either high walls or hedges to protect their privacy.

  • “Night time workers. Work at night, sleep at day. That’s not being a scrounger.”

    More to the point, being unemployed isn’t being a ‘scrounger’ either.

  • Good to see you thinking exactly the same way as I have been for several days again Mark. It’s odd how often this happens without you reading my blog; after all, if you HAD read my blog, you’d have credited me for the idea, wouldn’t you?

  • Come on Mark – take them on with both barrels! Who cares what stupid metaphors are used (qv “Alarm Clock Britain”) – the point is that we must as a party condemn without reservation demonisation of those drawing benefits, whether employed or unemployed whether disabled or mentally ill etc. That is part of our DNA as Lib Dems. We should NOT be stereotyping individuals within perceived groups. I am amazed anyone on here even gives this approach houseroom.

    Take on the tabloids!!

  • Keith Browning 8th Dec '12 - 2:07pm

    George never mentions the ‘Bertie Wooster’ types – those that arise in the morning, when they wish, because their ancestors have accumulated a portfolio of wealth, which means they can live, very comfortably, from the interest. Where do these people fit into life’s pecking order of strivers and skivers?

  • Hear hear Tim13 and Keith.

    Will someone please wake George Osborne? He has failed this country and yet sets things up for further failure.

    We hear all this talk about how we mustnt take more from the rich who have almost everything, as from the poor who have almost nothing. But why?!?

    What about people who’s entire job has been taken to “pay off the deficit”. Hardly fair to take more there!

    FFS

  • This has been a sustained attack by the Tories on those on any form of welfare. The attack has been more than just in words. Benefits are not set at lavish levels and most would struggle to live on them. Which means that restricting their rise to 1% is horrible politics to be associated with. Any benefit set at an appropriate leel should always be indexed linked…

    I would hope for a nice set up question at the next DPMQ’s to allow Clegg to distance himself from the 1% decision and remind Osbourne of some inconvenient facts about the vast majority of those on benefits…

  • Ruth Bright 8th Dec '12 - 5:47pm

    As I said on LDV a few days ago my brother works nights on a psychiatric ward – it’s nice to see the party establishment belatedly standing up for people like him who sleep in of a morning.

  • “I would hope for a nice set up question at the next DPMQ’s to allow Clegg to distance himself from the 1% decision …”

    Don’t forget that there is going to be a special bill to enact the 1% decision, which Lib Dem MPs will have to vote on. Not only will Nick Clegg not get an opportunity to “distance himself” from the decision. He – and the others – will have to go through the lobby and explicitly support it.

  • Simon Bamonte 9th Dec '12 - 2:30am

    Was anyone surprised? After all, since this coalition formed, the Tory side has been, in association with the right-wing media, been doing its utmost to convince the public that everyone who receives benefits, especially out-of-work benefits, is the Enemy and the cause of all our financial woes. This is what we expect of the Tories. Attacking the poor, the sick/disabled, unemployed and powerless is What They Do. Has Osborne never met someone like me who works but keeps his curtains closed because he simply doesn’t want every person walking by to see the interior of my home and what I own? Has he heard of people who work nights? The fact that they are so blatant in their prejudice and smears shows how desperate they have become to distract attention from themselves and the true causes of our financial woes: inept politicians (of all 3 main parties) and a greedy, multinational ruling class who use their power for not only unhealthy and unfair influence in our democracy but to avoid taxes on an epic scale, taxes due to the very society which allowed them to become so successful.

    As a (now former) Lib Dem, I see all three main parties as being generally at one with the Neoliberal consensus which has failed us for the past 30 years. To maintain this consensus, those who are unemployed through no fault of their own are demonised, while those who live off interest and the profits of the underpaid work of others are exalted as heroes and Men to Admire and if we were all just like them (and kept our curtains open), we’d reach the promised land. And that is a large part of what is wrong with our society now, but I don’t see the current LD leadership doing much to challenge (let alone change) this nasty “consensus”.

  • Tony Dawson 9th Dec '12 - 9:10am

    My very thick lined curtains are closed because if they were open my house would freeze! But I quite like being despised by that despicable man! :-)

  • jbt What I was trying (however imperfectly) to say, was, not that Mark was joining any condemnation of people “with drawn curtains” at any particular time, but asking people, including Mark, to instead address the underlying metaphor which Osborne was drawing in his speech, ie an implied condemnation of those on benefit. Which is why I say “take it head on”.

  • A lot of Tories keep their curtains closed so they can have something to twitch.

  • I’m surprised we haven’t yet had a newspaper expose the movements of the curtains at No’s 10 and 11 Downing Street …

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarChrisB 31st Oct - 2:46pm
    It's one of those rare moments that I agree with Huppert. >We need a “carrot and stick” approach to hard drugs. Yeah, it'd be great...
  • User Avatarbenj 31st Oct - 2:39pm
    @ Matthew "But that is the opposite of the original argument. There is no special “London tax” proposed. The idea is that wealthier people get...
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 31st Oct - 2:36pm
    @matthew - how does the success of financial services in London cause industry to be closed down elsewhere?
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 31st Oct - 2:31pm
    Yes Norman Lamb is probably right to criticise those halloween outfits. Although, people can take offence at everything. However, the statement "What’s scarier than the...
  • User Avatarbenj 31st Oct - 2:20pm
    @ Dav It is a black hole if it pays less in tax revenues than it's rental value of land . Unlike the value of...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 31st Oct - 2:18pm
    Dav London generates the wealth which keeps the UK running. Yes, and to what extent has that involved sucking up all the people with the...