In the news…

Chris Huhne is asking the police to investigate claims of “cash for amendments” in the House of Lords. (BBC)

Ken Clarke has barely got his feet under the table back in the Conservative Shadow Cabinet and he’s rubbishing the Osborne/Cameron line on the economy: “Clarke rejects party leader’s warning over loan from IMF.” (The Guardian)

Nick Clegg says the Conservatives will not offer the radical change we need. (BBC)

Share:
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/10686 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

6 Comments

  • Anonymous
    Posted 26th January 2009 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    The ban on ‘Extreme Pornography’, which the Lib Dems shamefully supported, comes into force…

  • Posted 26th January 2009 at 12:06 pm | Permalink

    Now you’ve done it. Google will detect the words Extreme Pornography and all heck will break loose. It’ll be like Baby P but much, much worse.

    I don’t have an overriding opinion on that issue, if I’m honest. I’m wondering if the Guardian hasn’t just wheeled out an oldish news story and tried to make it look fresh, or Cameron’s actually giving his whipped cabinet a bit of free comment space…

    What do you suppose the odds are for Clarke getting the boot before Mandleson? 5/4?

  • Hywel
    Posted 26th January 2009 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    Did we support it? (the EP ban that is)

    Sue Miller was strongly opposed to these provisions when they went through the Lords and supporting it would be partly inconsistent with the views Charles expressed as leader in this letter:
    http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/argch05.htm#A_Liberal_View_ (long page so search for Kennedy within it

  • JohnM
    Posted 27th January 2009 at 1:37 am | Permalink

    I guess that Lord Taylor of Blackburn, a Labour Peer caught money grubbing by the Sunday Times, chose to ignore the Code of Conduct found in the Register of Lords’ Interests:

    Members “must never accept any financial inducement as an incentive or reward for exercising parliamentary influence” and “must not vote on any bill or motion, or ask any question in the House or a committee, or promote any matter, in return for payment or any other material benefit”.

    I’m sure we’ll discover that dozens of Lords are making a packet from “paid advocacy”. If there are Lib Dems amongst them it could be that Mr Hulne has jumped the gun with his letter to the Dibble.

  • Hywel
    Posted 27th January 2009 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    “If there are Lib Dems amongst them it could be that Mr Hulne has jumped the gun with his letter to the Dibble.”

    Why? If there are Lib Dem peers engaged in such activities then I’d be happy to see them exposed and subject to whatever sanctions are available.

  • Voter
    Posted 27th January 2009 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    It seems that the Lib Dems did support the EP ban, at least according to a Law Weblog I found.

    Here is a quote (google to find the page)

    The Bill went through the Commons unchallenged and only in the House of Lords was there any significant opposition.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?