In the news…

Chris Huhne is asking the police to investigate claims of “cash for amendments” in the House of Lords. (BBC)

Ken Clarke has barely got his feet under the table back in the Conservative Shadow Cabinet and he’s rubbishing the Osborne/Cameron line on the economy: “Clarke rejects party leader’s warning over loan from IMF.” (The Guardian)

Nick Clegg says the Conservatives will not offer the radical change we need. (BBC)

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • The ban on ‘Extreme Pornography’, which the Lib Dems shamefully supported, comes into force…

  • Did we support it? (the EP ban that is)

    Sue Miller was strongly opposed to these provisions when they went through the Lords and supporting it would be partly inconsistent with the views Charles expressed as leader in this letter:
    http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/argch05.htm#A_Liberal_View_ (long page so search for Kennedy within it

  • I guess that Lord Taylor of Blackburn, a Labour Peer caught money grubbing by the Sunday Times, chose to ignore the Code of Conduct found in the Register of Lords’ Interests:

    Members “must never accept any financial inducement as an incentive or reward for exercising parliamentary influence” and “must not vote on any bill or motion, or ask any question in the House or a committee, or promote any matter, in return for payment or any other material benefit”.

    I’m sure we’ll discover that dozens of Lords are making a packet from “paid advocacy”. If there are Lib Dems amongst them it could be that Mr Hulne has jumped the gun with his letter to the Dibble.

  • “If there are Lib Dems amongst them it could be that Mr Hulne has jumped the gun with his letter to the Dibble.”

    Why? If there are Lib Dem peers engaged in such activities then I’d be happy to see them exposed and subject to whatever sanctions are available.

  • It seems that the Lib Dems did support the EP ban, at least according to a Law Weblog I found.

    Here is a quote (google to find the page)

    The Bill went through the Commons unchallenged and only in the House of Lords was there any significant opposition.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 23rd Sep - 1:43pm
    This uber ban is crying out for a centrist solution. Increase the regulation, but not an outright ban, especially not a permanent one. 523,000 have...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 23rd Sep - 1:33pm
    Unfortunately Labour's idea of working together is to support them unthinkingly. They view us as Labour mark 2 and simply don't understand that we may...
  • User AvatarJohn Littler 23rd Sep - 1:20pm
    The PPB was very amusing and may have more impact than any for a long time, perhaps since Cleese's. The groundhog day PPB was so...
  • User AvatarPhil Wainewright 23rd Sep - 1:15pm
    If we truly "believe in competitive markets" then every operator must be held accountable to the same rules - and the rules must ensure a...
  • User AvatarNick Thornsby 23rd Sep - 1:02pm
    Good piece Andy, and I agree with Paul Barker above. It is striking how many Lib Dems have supported the decision, on the implicit assumption...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 23rd Sep - 12:25pm
    In this case it feels to me that TFL were acting to protect "their" producers rather than their customers. TFL dont seem neutral in this,...