Independent View: two cheers for Vince

Landlords and punters across the country should be raising a glass to Vince Cable today after he announced new rules for pub companies (or pubcos) which will help local publicans in these difficult economic times.

His plans include the introduction of an independent adjudicator and a new statutory code for the industry – something I argued for in this IPPR report: Tied Down.

Pubs are an important part of the community – they’re a meeting place for family and friends and host meetings of local clubs and associations, promoting local charities and events. But they’ve faced serious demise with 16 pubs currently closing every week.

There is no one single reason for this – there are many (supermarket price competition, the recession, changing tastes and lifestyles). But the commercial structure of the industry is an important factor. The pub sector is dominated by the large pubcos and very many publicans operate under what is called a tied lease arrangement. This means they have to buy all their beer from the pubco that owns their pub at a list price and cannot buy it wholesale where it can often be bought cheaper at a discount. This considerably limits these publicans flexibility in what are very difficult times.

IPPR’s study found that publicans tied to a pubco are unlikely to make the same levels of profit as those that are not. Nearly half (46 per cent) earn less than £15,000 a year compared to just 22 per cent of independent publicans. They are more likely to be under financial pressure – almost three in five (57 per cent) said they were struggling financially compared to four in ten (43 per cent) of independent landlords. Being tied to a pub company was seen as a contributing factor to the financial hardship for the majority of these pubs (88%). Importantly few publicans thought that the revised voluntary code of practice introduced by the industry had made any difference.

Two cheers therefore for Vince Cable in announcing a stronger statutory code and an independent adjudicator, which will give publicans much greater power in their negotiations with the pubcos. In particular the new overarching ‘fair dealing’ provision is a significant reform. It would have been three cheers if he had gone further and given the publican the right to request a non tied lease. Nevertheless this represents a very welcome step towards resolving the crisis facing our pub industry.

* Rick Muir is Associate Director of IPPR

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News and The Independent View.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32590 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

2 Comments

  • John Heyworth 12th Jan '13 - 10:51am

    Well its a start….all drinkers agree that something has to be done to stop the pub co’s strangling the life out of the great British boozer. However as 2Real Ale Up North” points out in its recent article (http://realaleupnorth.blogspot.co.uk/#http://realaleupnorth.blogspot.com/2013/01/many-questions-to-be-asked-of-statutory.html) why has the threshold on being a pubco been set at 500? This figure will only affect the big six companys and whats to stop them from breaking their businesses into several smaler regional sub companies to avoid the rules. I have writen to Jo Swinson ,the minister responsable to seek clarification and assurances and await her response with interest.
    But as I said at the begining its a start at least.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Walter 20th Dec - 7:47am
    chris_sh:"do you also think that they should be held as PoWs for the duration of any conflict? " yes. " Will political types be willing...
  • User AvatarRichard 20th Dec - 7:17am
    @ John Tilley "This also begs the question — “..Why does the state subsidise crap employers to pay crap wages to people in crap jobs?”,...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 20th Dec - 4:31am
    @ Chris White I was disappointed with your response to my idea regarding helping certain groups to afford to attend conference as it would be...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 20th Dec - 3:43am
    The above remarks are quite naïve. Torture is not a means of gaining information from a prisoner; torture is a means of punishing and degrading...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 20th Dec - 3:32am
    Charlie, By 24th June 1944 there were 233,000 casualties and losses in the invasion of Normandy. Some people would say that figure was "immense". http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Normandy
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 20th Dec - 3:24am
    Hywel ".,,Joe is right to focus on the direction of movement though. Which makes it worrying that this is “southwards” in Sheffield Hallam (even with...
Sat 20th Dec 2014
Sat 3rd Jan 2015
Wed 14th Jan 2015
Thu 15th Jan 2015
Fri 16th Jan 2015