Individual electoral registration: Northern Ireland shows that the annual canvass must be kept

Electoral Commission logoOne of the key disputes over how individual electoral registration should be introduced in England, Scotland and Wales is whether having people join and leave the register regularly through the year, alongside better use of other information about people moving (e.g. prompting people who take out a new TV license to register), would mean that the once-a-year check on all addresses – the ‘annual canvass’ – can be dropped.

The Electoral Commission has just published the results of its research into how individual electoral registration has been working in Northern Ireland since its introduction there in 2002. The conclusion? An annual canvass must be kept.

Following the introduction of IER in Northern Ireland in 2002 the requirement for an annual canvass was removed in 2006, which meant that electors were registered once and only had to re-register if their personal details changed. This research looked at the effectiveness of continuous registration in Northern Ireland.

The report shows that the electoral register is now 71% complete and 78% accurate. The previous assessment carried out in 2008 estimated the register to be 83% complete and 94% accurate. The current findings suggest that the reason for this significant decline is because the processes currently employed by the Chief Electoral Officer to manage the register under continuous registration are unable to keep pace with either people moving home or people becoming newly eligible to join the register…

The Electoral Registration and Administration Bill, currently before the UK Parliament, provides for the annual canvass to remain in Great Britain following the introduction of IER. It is therefore likely that Great Britain will avoid the main problems of continuous registration that have been experienced in Northern Ireland.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Tony Dawson 28th Nov '12 - 6:20pm

    In this age of austerity, we could do with closing down the Electoral Commission sooner than yesterday. We do not need their research into the fact that individual registration will reduce overall registration, particularly among the younger, poorer and more mobile sections of society. The ‘problem’ which this is being brought in to attempt to remedy could be dealt with by spending a few thousand pounds on investigation and serious prosecutions, properly publicised.

    When will the Electoral Commission address the serious waste of spending which is presently allowed on parliamentary by-elections to satisfy the whims of national political parties who want to make more out of these than what they are meant to be? When is the Electoral Commission going to sort out the fact that the present election expenses rules permit virtually infinite expenditure in small wards under the ‘notional expenses’ rules with a Nil return? Don’t hold your breath.

  • Alex Macfie 29th Nov '12 - 1:20pm

    Tony: Individual registration is being brought in to stop situations like the one that anyone who has ever canvassed will have encountered: the house or flat that has several occupants, but none of them are on the electoral register, and the person who *is* registered to vote there is the non-resident landlord! The victims of this situation tend to be precisely the “younger, poorer and more mobile sections of society” that you refer to. Individual registration ensures that voters always have the power to ensure that they are on the electoral register, i.e. that it is not in the hands of some “head of household” who may be disinterested or even have an active interest in preventing them from getting on the electoral register.

    And talk of “austerity” is inappropriate here. We are talking about maintaining integrity of the voting process. This cannot be done on the cheap.

  • IER is a nonsense and a waste of public money. Forcing people to register and combining non-compliance with authoritarian punishments is not the way to increase turnout, involvement in elections or interest in the political process. What none of the parties have grasped is that the reason for low turnout is that they have detached themselves from the public. they live in their own little world, thinking theyre fantastic “representatives” when the fact is theyre not. Compulsory IER is totalitarian period. But it also will not solve the problem. not until political parties face up and acknowledge theyre the problem: not the public. Politicians would do well to remember that they serve us, not the other way round. Its the service part of”public service”.

  • Richard Underhill 31st Mar '16 - 1:59pm

    The Irish Times reports on 31/3/2016 that émigré Irish are seeking electoral registration (which some UK citizens have).
    The Irish Labour Party dropped from 57 members of the Dail to 7, causing pressure on their leader to resign. Fine Gael is negotiating with Independents, but the Irish Times is pessimistic on the likelihood of the Dail electing a Prime Minister when it next meets. As the leader of the largest party Enda Kenny is most likely to continue, eventually.

  • nvelope2003 31st Mar '16 - 3:36pm

    Some of the decline in turnout could be the result of the toatlly unrealistic expectations which many people seem to have. This may be partly the fault of the politicians but there is more to it than that. The press, the schools and the absurdly cynical attitude of many so called adults all have a part in this culture of moaning and over inflated ambitions.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPat 27th Jul - 8:09am
    Are the Conservatives the only political party prepared to have a crack at making Brexit successful? It is so disappointing that the Lib Dems seem...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 27th Jul - 8:05am
    Sadly, another article telling us how simply wrong so many people are who voted Brexit. Apparently "Many of those Brexiteers have never lived abroad or...
  • User Avatarexpats 27th Jul - 7:45am
    IMO the 'long and the short' of the overwhelming age related gap in voting preference was the nostalgia among the older generation.... A nostalgia for...
  • User AvatarJohn Peters 27th Jul - 6:48am
    malc Perhaps the strategy of suggesting 30% of your supporters are idiots isn't a vote winner. Never mind, it would be completely different result if...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 27th Jul - 1:13am
    I really commend Fiona , Paul , Richard , for their positive attitude while also recognising the difficult situation our party faces . I am...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 27th Jul - 12:54am
    On Brexit, this atheist is reminded of the saying "Hate the sin, love the sinner!" Many people misguidedly voted Leave because they held very legitimate...
Thu 28th Jul 2016
Sat 30th Jul 2016
Mon 1st Aug 2016
Wed 3rd Aug 2016
Sat 6th Aug 2016
Wed 10th Aug 2016
Fri 12th Aug 2016
19:00
Sat 13th Aug 2016
Tue 16th Aug 2016
Thu 18th Aug 2016
Sun 21st Aug 2016