Inexperienced officers in protest frontline – never again, say MPs

An inquiry by MPs into the 1 April G20 protests has concluded that untrained police officers must never again be placed in the frontline of public protest.

From the Guardian:

The conclusion from the Commons home affairs select committee inquiry into the G20 protests of April 1 follows admissions from senior Metropolitan police officers that some inexperienced officers, who were clearly quite scared, used “inappropriate force”.

The report by the cross-party group of MPs says they “cannot condone the use of untrained, inexperienced officers on the frontline of a public protest under any circumstances”.

The inquiry also calls for the police to seriously consider whether they can continue with the use of tactics such as kettling – containing protesters behind cordons for a sustained period of time – and the controlled use of force against those who appear hostile without first holding a public debate over the future of policing public protests.

The report includes sections on Relations with the Media, Communications between Protesters and Police, Use of Close Containment, The Use of Force and The Use of Tasers. It does not comment on the death of Ian Tomlinson, instead summarising the policing of the G20 protests as a “remarkably successful operation” and making only oblique reference to “a few high-profile incidents.”

The report also says that, given the use of untrained and inexperienced officers “in such a highly combustible atmosphere”, the operation’s success was down to luck.

You can read the full report here.

Also see Libby Purves in the Times on how policing civilians is a subtle and unresearched science.

As the Committee Chairman Keith Vaz said,

The basic principle that the police must remember is that protestors are not criminals – the police’s doctrine must remain focused on allowing protest to happen peacefully.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/15503 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

  • God I’m a cynic these days.

    My immediate thought is:

    “In the wake of headlines showing him in a less than positive light, Keith Vaz attempts to score points with the anti-authority & anti-authoritarian guardian types by appearing to confront the police.
    Cleverly he manages to also score points with the police by blaming failures on ‘innexperienced’ officers rather than police policy or even incompetent officers.’ ”

    And as I don’t have any time to wade through the actual evidence I guess I’ll stay ambivalent on Vaz and the Met.

  • Europhile-EUphobe 30th Jun '09 - 10:37am

    So the select committee swallows whole the argument ‘It isn’t our good police force becoming ever more extreme in its policing of dissent and using ever more draconean interpretations of its powers (e.g. kettling), but a few officers we had to use who weren’t properly trained (probably not properly trained to put their id badges on either) and the problem will all go away once we get them trained (presumably trained not to get caught).

  • I don’t swallow the whole ‘untrained officers’ was the problem line. For one thing ALL PCs get basic training in public order policing as part of their training to become a PC. Secondly as far as I can see it was not ‘untrained’ Officers that were at the centre of most of the most contiverial actions but rather the complete opposite, the supposedly highly trained and specialist Terratorial Support Group Officers.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid-1 30th Mar - 6:36am
    I think the usual approach to immigration is completely backwards. People start by asking "how many immigrants can we tolerate?" and, once that is answered...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Mar - 4:39am
    @ Stuart This is getting rather tiresome... I did get it, I have studied economics and have a reasonable grasp of statistics. I know the...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Mar - 3:28am
    @ Stuart "There is no need for you to come up with your own “interpretation” of what Labour’s pledge means, because Labour have been very...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Mar - 3:10am
    @ PT I agree with you that GDP per head is a better proxy for economic welfare than the absolute level of GDP, which merely...
  • User AvatarGary Mc 30th Mar - 12:47am
    I've noticed all of the polls seem to give the SNP more seats than us (Liberal Democrats). I'm not sure the SNP will win as...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 29th Mar - 11:39pm
    Immigration must be restricted to the number of people we can integrate and absorb culturally, socially and economically each year. It must be planned so...
Tue 31st Mar 2015
Sun 5th Apr 2015
Sat 11th Apr 2015
Sun 12th Apr 2015
Sat 25th Apr 2015