Inexperienced officers in protest frontline – never again, say MPs

An inquiry by MPs into the 1 April G20 protests has concluded that untrained police officers must never again be placed in the frontline of public protest.

From the Guardian:

The conclusion from the Commons home affairs select committee inquiry into the G20 protests of April 1 follows admissions from senior Metropolitan police officers that some inexperienced officers, who were clearly quite scared, used “inappropriate force”.

The report by the cross-party group of MPs says they “cannot condone the use of untrained, inexperienced officers on the frontline of a public protest under any circumstances”.

The inquiry also calls for the police to seriously consider whether they can continue with the use of tactics such as kettling – containing protesters behind cordons for a sustained period of time – and the controlled use of force against those who appear hostile without first holding a public debate over the future of policing public protests.

The report includes sections on Relations with the Media, Communications between Protesters and Police, Use of Close Containment, The Use of Force and The Use of Tasers. It does not comment on the death of Ian Tomlinson, instead summarising the policing of the G20 protests as a “remarkably successful operation” and making only oblique reference to “a few high-profile incidents.”

The report also says that, given the use of untrained and inexperienced officers “in such a highly combustible atmosphere”, the operation’s success was down to luck.

You can read the full report here.

Also see Libby Purves in the Times on how policing civilians is a subtle and unresearched science.

As the Committee Chairman Keith Vaz said,

The basic principle that the police must remember is that protestors are not criminals – the police’s doctrine must remain focused on allowing protest to happen peacefully.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • God I’m a cynic these days.

    My immediate thought is:

    “In the wake of headlines showing him in a less than positive light, Keith Vaz attempts to score points with the anti-authority & anti-authoritarian guardian types by appearing to confront the police.
    Cleverly he manages to also score points with the police by blaming failures on ‘innexperienced’ officers rather than police policy or even incompetent officers.’ ”

    And as I don’t have any time to wade through the actual evidence I guess I’ll stay ambivalent on Vaz and the Met.

  • Europhile-EUphobe 30th Jun '09 - 10:37am

    So the select committee swallows whole the argument ‘It isn’t our good police force becoming ever more extreme in its policing of dissent and using ever more draconean interpretations of its powers (e.g. kettling), but a few officers we had to use who weren’t properly trained (probably not properly trained to put their id badges on either) and the problem will all go away once we get them trained (presumably trained not to get caught).

  • I don’t swallow the whole ‘untrained officers’ was the problem line. For one thing ALL PCs get basic training in public order policing as part of their training to become a PC. Secondly as far as I can see it was not ‘untrained’ Officers that were at the centre of most of the most contiverial actions but rather the complete opposite, the supposedly highly trained and specialist Terratorial Support Group Officers.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLorenzo 11th Feb - 12:03am
    Thomas yes , I agree but was questioning the level of support and not wondering in what way we could monopolise things , by any...
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 10th Feb - 11:32pm
    Ruth -doesn't your example illustrate the flawed reasoning here however? Men make up 20% of Primary Teachers not because they are discriminated against when applying...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 10th Feb - 11:30pm
    Chris_sh - Horse-trading is just a rude word for negotiation and compromise, which are essential for adult politics. It works well when parties have a...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 10th Feb - 11:29pm
    Caron Lindsay 10th Feb '16 - 10:40pm No, inbetween.
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 10th Feb - 11:25pm
    The process is accelerating. Sir Winston Churchill thought that referendums were undemocratic, the sort of thing that Mussolini would do. Edward Heath thought the same...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 10th Feb - 10:40pm
    Can I just say to @tpfkar that the Holyrood and Welsh Assembly elections are NOT local elections. They are our general election.