Influence of Sarah Palin and the Tea Party drops off

In the New York Times, Michael D Shear reports that the influence of Sarah Palin and the Tea Party has waned during the US Republican Presidential primaries:

In October, Sarah Palin announced that she would not run for president in 2012, ending the media frenzy around her potential candidacy even as she vowed to remain politically active and influential.

“I will continue driving the discussion for freedom and free markets,” she wrote in an e-mail to her supporters.

Just over three months later her attempts to wield influence in the presidential campaign the way she did during the 2010 midterm elections have largely fizzled.

…Over the last two weeks,, Ms. Palin has urged voters in South Carolina and Florida to vote for Newt Gingrich as a way of striking back against the Republican establishment in Washington and against liberals.

Despite a stunning win in South Carolina, Gingrich was way behind Romney in Florida.

You can read the full article here.

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist in Newbury and West Berkshire. He is part of the Liberal Democrat Voice team and blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPhilip 13th Feb - 7:20pm
    With respect, would the Lib Dems be happy for the UK to lose all "unilateral" sovereignty as regards the EU, ie Cameron's "emergency handbrake" which...
  • User AvatarPhilip 13th Feb - 7:11pm
    "Talk of a EU “super-state” is nonsense." - if the EU controls our borders and has been increasingly overruling our Parliament, in what sense is...
  • User AvatarPeter Reynolds 13th Feb - 7:05pm
    @A Social Liberal: "– including skunk? You know, the type of cannabis which causes paranoia and at it’s worst psychotic episodes which can last years."...
  • User AvatarVictor Grayson 13th Feb - 6:57pm
    Hi Chris-sh, the economic costs and benefits of us being in the EU seem to be so difficult to weigh up without detailed accurate information....
  • User AvatarChris_sh 13th Feb - 6:26pm
    Hi Peter thanks for the reply, I think I get what you're saying, time will tell :-D Hi Victor thanks for the reply, I would...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 13th Feb - 4:54pm
    Mark Wright is right: "It’s no wonder that so many people appear to be forced to make a false-choice between the love of the EU...