Is the end in sight for Returning Officer bonuses?

I’ve written often enough before about the problems with the “bonus” payments that Returning Officers receive for doing their job at election time. One problem is that they receive the bonuses in full even if they have messed up dreadfully, though that is now changing. The other is that the grounds for having the bonuses in the first place are pretty thin:

The role of being Returning Officer goes with having a job – typically council chief executive –  that is usually well paid to begin with (often six figure salaries) and where anyone taking on the job knows that it will involve them being Returning Officer…

The idea that there is a special extra payment for running an election stretches back to a time when contested elections were far less frequent (fewer elected bodies and uncontested seats more common). When having to run an election was an unusual requirement, an extra payment made sense. Now that regularly running elections is the norm it looks a rather unsatisfactory arrangement.

It is therefore good news from Wales where:

Council chief executives would only be paid as returning officers for work they do outside their normal office hours under proposals from the Welsh government.

A white paper suggests ending so-called double funding for elections staff.

It would mean council officials cannot be paid for working as electoral officers while also being paid by their authorities.

The plans are contained in a consultation on a Local Democracy Bill.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Election law, News and Wales.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Presumably the payment is therefore a statutory one and not one that a local authority can change or withhold?

  • John Carlisle 22nd May '12 - 9:08am

    Why not just come out and say it: “BONUSES ARE BAD!” – anywhere, anytime any organisation. You get paid to do the job. Full Stop.
    That should be the LibDem mantra

  • This article demonstrates the interesting effect of using a perjorative term such as ‘bonus’. The point at issue here is not a bonus, but an extra payment for doing an extra task. The task does not appear to be an onerous task, and the payment should be comensurate with the required work. In line with some of the previous comments, I think the extra payment should be no more than the council official’s normal overtime rate (zero for management grades?).

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Walter 29th May - 4:22pm
    You missed Panorama, Tomorrow's Food, Watchdog and Antiques Roadshow, Glenn. Why so coy? And The Apprentice was created by Mark Burnett, not Donald Trump.
  • User AvatarGlenn 29th May - 4:08pm
    Expats My argument if you read it is Consistent. I think the BBC mostly produces utter tripe and I don't watch ITV either, coz I...
  • User AvatarConor McGovern 29th May - 4:08pm
    I think a big part of it could come down to policy. I recently heard Jeremy Corbyn saying he wants to build Labour policy now...
  • User AvatarNom de Plume 29th May - 4:03pm
    I am also a supporter of publicly funded broadcasters. I find, given the choice to choose between watching the publicly funded TV and commercial alternatives...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 29th May - 4:02pm
    Glenn " Why do they have to pay twice if to watch something on say Sky even if they can afford it?" 96% of people...
  • User AvatarAndrew 29th May - 3:32pm
    Also interesting how this summary doesn't mention the (largely false) attack piece on Liberal Youth