John Cleese on Sarah Palin

See what John Cleese thinks about Sarah Palin.

“Monty Python could have written this!”

Share:
This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/4885 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

6 Comments

  • Susan Gaszczak
    Posted 15th October 2008 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for my daily Palin hit!

  • Posted 15th October 2008 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    Yet it is not the parrot, but her running mate who is most likely to end up dead.

    I can see it now, the terrible prospect of a Palin presidency grips the staff doctors at the white house. McCain is not dead, they will say, he’s just pining. For the fjords.

    Tho to be fair I think there is some research suggesting that some parrots do understand some of the words they use – to the extent of being able to associate them with appropriate cues.

  • Cheltenham robin
    Posted 15th October 2008 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    Let’s be fair

    Sarah Palin is: ‘Something completely different’

  • Anon
    Posted 16th October 2008 at 3:14 am | Permalink

    “I always thought that Michael was the funniest Palin?”… the faintest praise I have ever heard.

  • Posted 16th October 2008 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    The full length interview of John Cleese talking about the upcoming election can be found here http://seesmic.com/video/VSomeIE9D4

  • john
    Posted 16th October 2008 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    i wish he was a Lib Dem peer…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?