Judgement Day for Boris Johnson’s first year in office

It’s Annual Report time for Boris Johnson, and the London Assembly will meet this morning to debate the Mayor’s 2008/08 report and first year in office.

Despite having sections on economic recovery, tackling crime, quality of life and “A Mayor for all Londoners”, here are some things the report omits:

Boris’s broken manifesto promises:

1. Keep the Tube open for an extra hour on Friday and Saturday nights
2. Negotiate a no-strike deal with Tube unions. (Commuters to London today will know the reality of this.)
3. Convene an “emergency” public summit of train operating companies to deliver Oyster to train services
4. Introduce an interactive, real-time bus map
5. Fund four rape crisis centres (the promised funding required is 50% short)
6. Build 50,000 new affordable homes (this pledge has been dropped)
7. Support the Low Emission Zone (has suspended its third phase)
8. Create a Cabinet for London.

And what he has done:
· Put up public transport fares by 6 – 11%
· Abandoned major transport projects in the poorest parts of London, such as the DLR extension to Dagenham and the Cross River tram from South London to Camden.
· Scrapped plans to ensure that 50% of all new housing be affordable
· Axed £5.5m funding to skills programmes, expecting the boroughs to pick up the tab
· Cut funding in the environment by £500,000
· Suspended the Low Emission Zone
· Refused to show leadership on strategic planning matters

How will Boris explain these today?

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in London and News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Sadly Boris won’t be required today to explain himself. It’s a plenary meeting of the London Assembly without the Mayor in attendence

    However the debate about Boris’ first year is bound to spill over into next Wednesdays (June 17th) Mayor’s Question Time meeting, if only because the Mayor’s office seem intent on censoring anyone who criticises the Mayor. See http://torytroll.blogspot.com/ for further detail.

    Good job the Mayor’s office seems to have missed Lib Dem Assesmbly Member Mike Tuffrey’s critique of the first Mayoral year! See http://tr.im/nZRF

  • Um, a pledge for a term doesn’t need to be carried out in its first year.

    In any case, I suggest that the Lib Dems are not in a good position to preach about breaking manifesto commitments. Can anyone say the words “Lisbon Treaty”?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStewart 27th Jun - 3:49pm
    You scare me a little, Alex Macfie. I hope you have no real influence in the party.
  • User AvatarDavid-1 27th Jun - 3:20pm
    Given that the Tories, in both of their Leave and Remain factions (which can now be seen as a coordinated and cynical attempt to cover...
  • User AvatarConor McGovern 27th Jun - 3:09pm
    It's great having new members from all walks of life calling the Lib Dems their home. :)
  • User AvatarMatt Jackson 27th Jun - 3:07pm
    Agree Dean. The driving forces behind why people voted the way they did are numerous and complex and cannot be distilled down into 2 or...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 27th Jun - 2:59pm
    OK so lets call it 67,000. Beware spurious accuracy. Thats a lot more than I imagined. Has anyone told Wiki?
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 27th Jun - 2:58pm
    @Andrew McCaig "I think if there was another General Election before article 50 is enacted, and the majority of MPs following that election voted not...