Labour MP Emily Thornberry in trouble… again

Islington South & Finsbury Labour MP Emily Thornberry is an old friend of LDV – we noted her hypocrisy here (September) and her ticking off by the Parliament’s standards watchdog here (October).

Now Ms Thornberry is in trouble again – this time for using taxpayers’ money to send out unsolicited letters to residents on Parliamentary stationery using pre-paid envelopes. She is being forced by the Serjeant-at-Arms to pay back the money she illegitimately spent in the run-up to the 2007 election-that-never-was. As the MP sent out at least 10,400 letters with first-class postage, she could face a bill of some £4,245 as a result of this decision.

In a letter from Sir Philip Mawer, the Standards Commissioner, received this week, residents were satisfied to discover that their complaint was upheld and Ms Thornberry will be forced to pay back the money. Sir Philip wrote:

“It is clear to me that Ms Thornberry should not have used pre-paid envelopes at all for this exercise (since her letter was unsolicited) but should have covered the cost of the stationery and envelopes and the postage required directly, either from her Communications Allowance or out of her own pocket.” He continued: “She has indicated that she will reimburse the cost of the pre-paid envelopes she used and I have asked her to do this.”

Emily Thornberry’s majority over the Lib Dems’ Bridget Fox at the last general election was a wafer-thin 484.

Share:
This entry was posted in Opposition watch. Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/1961 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

4 Comments

  • Richard Gadsden
    Posted 11th January 2008 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    Aside from the relatively minor publicity damage, there’s really no incentive not to do this – if you get caught, then you just have to pay the money you would have had to pay anyway.

    There should be a penalty for being dishonest and getting caught, else there is no incentive to be honest.

  • Posted 11th January 2008 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    Richard, what do you recommend?

  • Hywel Morgan
    Posted 11th January 2008 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    Loss of the Communications Allowance for a certain period would seem a reasonable sanction.

  • Simon
    Posted 12th January 2008 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    I think Hywel’s suggestion is excellent.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?