Labour peer Alan Sugar: don’t vote for Ken Livingstone

From the BBC:

Labour peer Lord Sugar has urged people not to vote for his party’s candidate Ken Livingstone.

The peer defied Labour leader Ed Miliband by telling his 1.8 million followers on Twitter not to back the former mayor’s bid for re-election.

“I seriously suggest NO ONE votes for Livingstone in the Mayoral elections,” he wrote.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

13 Comments

  • “If Ken keeps going this way, we might see Brian come second to Boris in the election…”

    Considering that the latest opinion poll places Livingstone at 35% and Paddick at 11%, one can only marvel at comments like this.

  • Alex Macfie 19th Apr '12 - 7:35pm

    I don’t think we should be making any recommendations for 2nd preference. Personally I am more anti-Ken than anti-Boris and shall use my 2nd preference accordingly. But if we start making recommendations as a party then we make it look like Brian is not a serious contender.

  • No surprise here the two of them are known not to get on. He would lose the Labour Whip if he recommended another candidate though…

  • Alex Macfie 19th Apr '12 - 8:12pm

    So why has Ken not lost the Labour whip for backing that Islamist in Tower Hamlets?

  • Alex Macfie 19th Apr '12 - 8:13pm

    or rather, why has he not been expelled (since he has no whip… silly me)

  • Foregone Conclusion 19th Apr '12 - 9:13pm

    @Chris,

    We’re on 11%? Well, that’s five points better than I thought. Obviously we are at the beginning of PADDICKMANIA!!!

    (Well, why not? It’s no more ludicrous than its predecessor…)

  • Daniel Henry 19th Apr '12 - 10:38pm

    Dave was clearly suggesting that we could tempt Labour supporters who don’t like Ken to try Brian as their first pref while still being able to use their second pref on Ken as a back up.

  • “Dave was clearly suggesting that we could tempt Labour supporters who don’t like Ken to try Brian as their first pref while still being able to use their second pref on Ken as a back up.”

    Well, obviously that wasn’t the part of his comment I was disagreeing with.

    I did quote the bit I was referring to, to make it specially easy (as I thought!) for people to understand.

  • Brian is probably too qualified and not sufficiently preposterous to be London Mayor. Look at what we have: a self-styled tribune of the people who is as aggressive about protecting his income as any City commodities trader, and a buffoon who found his true calling in hosting “Have I Got News for You”. Sound and fury signifying nothing, least of all, progress.

  • Jayne Mansfield 24th Apr '12 - 1:02pm

    Did Sir Alan share his reasons for why we should not vote for Ken Livingstone?
    If not, why not? Are we expected to unquestionably accept his every word like some ambitious wannabee apprentice s.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 25th Sep - 7:47pm
    Stevan, the fact of your not knowing that every member can vote at Conference suggests you don't pay much attention to it. In fact, the...
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 25th Sep - 7:11pm
    Edit function please! - 'saw,' = 'say' at line 2.
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 25th Sep - 7:10pm
    Sorry, you've totally lost me here. Firstly, you appear to have two, 'sixth,' points and saw, 'two,' much freedom when presumably that should be, 'too.'...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 25th Sep - 7:02pm
    @ Phyllis, What all the people who are behind Jeremy Corbyn? I have no doubt that those who feel threatened have reason to feel as...
  • User AvatarGordon 25th Sep - 6:54pm
    "selecting on the basis of an exam at the age of eleven is silly." Agreed. It's not just the age - it's also just one...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 25th Sep - 6:30pm
    http://www.libdemvoice.org/creative-commons-government-51525.html