Labour Police Commissioner candidate set to defy ban on magistrates

As if two Labour candidates for Police and Crime Commissioner posts running into problems with past misdeeds wasn’t enough, now a third is set to defy the ban on magistrates standing:

Lee Barron, the Labour candidate for the new post, has revealed how is prepared to refuse to stand down as a magistrate before the election, which will be held in November.

Guidance issued last Friday by a senior judge has effectively barred magistrates from standing for the post, which in Northamptonshire comes with an estimated £70,000 salary…

He said: “I am going to say I am not going to stand down, I am going to carry on”. [Northampton Chronicle]

Many Conservative candidates are also likely to face a problem:

It is thought that the guidance issued last Friday by the senior presiding judge in England and Wales could affect as many as six or seven – a fifth – of the official Tory candidates so far adopted and others who are standing as independents or for other parties.

One of the Conservatives’ leading candidates openly attacked the judge’s ruling on Thursday night. Craig Mackinlay, the frontrunner to become the police and crime commissioner in Kent, contacted the Guardian on Twitter and said: “Massive row developing (about) PCCs and magistrates. I am ‘caught’. Unacceptable and nonsensical. Post election can agree but not pre.”

His intervention came as those affected started to take the first steps to launch a possible legal challenge to Lord Justice Goldring’s decision.

Among the independents affected will be Ann Barnes, who has been chair of Kent police authority for the past six years.

Goldring’s guidance is also believed to ban the dozens of elected councillors who are also magistrates from serving on police and crime panels, which are being introduced to scrutinise the actions of elected police commissioners. [The Guardian]

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/29816 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

6 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 25th Jan - 4:01pm
    @Harry What is disrespectful about suggesting that someone whose values are so out of kilter with the party's should step down from one of its...
  • User AvatarAlice Thomas 25th Jan - 4:01pm
    Jedibeeftrix and ChrisB - this article, and the NMP3 campaign, are not arguing for a ban. Roland - its not massively different, but it is...
  • User AvatarHarry Hayfield 25th Jan - 3:42pm
    I lived in Montgomeryshire constituency twice from 1982 - 1989 and from 1993 - 1998 in the towns of Machynlleth and Welshpool. On the second...
  • User AvatarPhilip Wilson 25th Jan - 3:42pm
    Having recently left the Green Party and joined the Lib dems I can say that the Green Party may be a threat this election but...
  • User AvatarChrisB 25th Jan - 3:41pm
    > a daily national newspaper is not the place for it, because it’s supposed to be for news This semantic argument doesn't hold - the...
  • User AvatarAndy Hinton 25th Jan - 3:38pm
    Agree completely Caron, except perhaps for the bit about "that tends not to be the way they do things". Officially you are right, but there...