Labour Police Commissioner candidate set to defy ban on magistrates

As if two Labour candidates for Police and Crime Commissioner posts running into problems with past misdeeds wasn’t enough, now a third is set to defy the ban on magistrates standing:

Lee Barron, the Labour candidate for the new post, has revealed how is prepared to refuse to stand down as a magistrate before the election, which will be held in November.

Guidance issued last Friday by a senior judge has effectively barred magistrates from standing for the post, which in Northamptonshire comes with an estimated £70,000 salary…

He said: “I am going to say I am not going to stand down, I am going to carry on”. [Northampton Chronicle]

Many Conservative candidates are also likely to face a problem:

It is thought that the guidance issued last Friday by the senior presiding judge in England and Wales could affect as many as six or seven – a fifth – of the official Tory candidates so far adopted and others who are standing as independents or for other parties.

One of the Conservatives’ leading candidates openly attacked the judge’s ruling on Thursday night. Craig Mackinlay, the frontrunner to become the police and crime commissioner in Kent, contacted the Guardian on Twitter and said: “Massive row developing (about) PCCs and magistrates. I am ‘caught’. Unacceptable and nonsensical. Post election can agree but not pre.”

His intervention came as those affected started to take the first steps to launch a possible legal challenge to Lord Justice Goldring’s decision.

Among the independents affected will be Ann Barnes, who has been chair of Kent police authority for the past six years.

Goldring’s guidance is also believed to ban the dozens of elected councillors who are also magistrates from serving on police and crime panels, which are being introduced to scrutinise the actions of elected police commissioners. [The Guardian]

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/29816 for Twitter and emails.

6 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRadical Liberal 19th Apr - 3:26pm
    Stephen Howse writes 'Far too polarising a figure'. But, of course, Clegg isn't. One rule for the right wing leadership, another rule for everyone else...
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 19th Apr - 2:57pm
    Simon, I believe non-taxpayers can already get tax relief on pension contributions up to a limit of £3600 a year after relief. Aimed at non-earning...
  • User AvatarRoland 19th Apr - 2:48pm
    @JohnTilley You raise an interesting and important points about what units people use and take note of: Firstly, your observation about cars. I suspect that...
  • User Avatarpeter tyzack 19th Apr - 2:18pm
    .. they can't announce the shortlist yet as there are at least two appeals to be sorted out first...
  • User AvatarRoland 19th Apr - 2:07pm
    Jenny, I'm not sure which bit of my point you were referring to in the first part of your comment. My understanding is that wind...
  • User AvatarStephen Howse 19th Apr - 2:04pm
    Far too polarising a figure. As for this: "Given the dominance of white men in the party leadership – our leader, deputy leader, party president...