Law Commission sets out details for review of election law

From the Law Commission’s website:

We have commenced work on reforming electoral law.  We expect to open a consultation in late 2014.  A report with recommendations to Government will be published in summer 2015…

The twin aims of the project are to ensure, first, that electoral laws are presented within a rational, modern legislative framework, governing all elections and referendums under statute; and second, that the law governing the conduct of elections and referendums is modern, simple, and fit for purpose.

More details are on the Law Commission’s website but it’s worth noting that the prime intent is to tidy up the current law rather than create radically different laws. In the Law Commission’s phrase, electoral law is currently “complex, voluminous and fragmented”. The review is intended to tackle that and not to consider “wider policy issues”.

 

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Richard Marbrow 12th Dec '12 - 12:52pm

    Is “complex, voluminous and fragmented” the newspeak for batcrap crazy?

  • 2015! not sure I can wait that long

  • Peter Hayes 12th Dec '12 - 9:53pm

    What is the point? Both major parties want the HOL as a place to pension off old retainers. And as kick Nick proved a referendum on any changes can be hijacked.

  • Richard Percival 13th Dec '12 - 4:09pm

    “batcrap crazy” – quite possibly, but I am not sure we have a view on what “batcrap” adds to “crazy”.
    Richard Percival, Public Law Team Manager, Law Commission

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBloke 24th Aug - 12:37am
    “I wonder if you would have said it had the suggestion come from a Lib Dem MP ?” @David Raw: Yes. They would have got...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 24th Aug - 12:12am
    @ Joe Bourke “First social justice. Property taxes are fairer than income taxes. In the UK the wealthiest 1% own almost 25% of all property.”...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 23rd Aug - 11:47pm
    @ Thomas I never said you said that Religious and History studies must be abolished. I did mention offering better alternatives to university which would...
  • User AvatarTim13 23rd Aug - 11:23pm
    Lorenzo I think the evidence shows there is very little gained from short sentences, which is what motivates proponents, not the fact that they are...
  • User AvatarTim13 23rd Aug - 11:18pm
    Apologies - Should have said "kept our subsidies over the last couple of years" (not days!!)
  • User AvatarTim13 23rd Aug - 11:16pm
    nvelope 2003 I really think we do have to go in for considerable public subsidies for poblic transport. I do agree with you that services...