Law Commission sets out details for review of election law

From the Law Commission’s website:

We have commenced work on reforming electoral law.  We expect to open a consultation in late 2014.  A report with recommendations to Government will be published in summer 2015…

The twin aims of the project are to ensure, first, that electoral laws are presented within a rational, modern legislative framework, governing all elections and referendums under statute; and second, that the law governing the conduct of elections and referendums is modern, simple, and fit for purpose.

More details are on the Law Commission’s website but it’s worth noting that the prime intent is to tidy up the current law rather than create radically different laws. In the Law Commission’s phrase, electoral law is currently “complex, voluminous and fragmented”. The review is intended to tackle that and not to consider “wider policy issues”.

 

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Richard Marbrow 12th Dec '12 - 12:52pm

    Is “complex, voluminous and fragmented” the newspeak for batcrap crazy?

  • 2015! not sure I can wait that long

  • Peter Hayes 12th Dec '12 - 9:53pm

    What is the point? Both major parties want the HOL as a place to pension off old retainers. And as kick Nick proved a referendum on any changes can be hijacked.

  • Richard Percival 13th Dec '12 - 4:09pm

    “batcrap crazy” – quite possibly, but I am not sure we have a view on what “batcrap” adds to “crazy”.
    Richard Percival, Public Law Team Manager, Law Commission

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 30th Mar - 11:32pm
    @ Fiona, Young people do not need to get their advice on drug taking from drug dealers. They can access information from multiple sources. The...
  • User Avatarmatt 30th Mar - 11:18pm
    I get why a patients own GP's are reluctant to carry out assessments because it might cause friction with their patient if they did not...
  • User Avatarfrankie 30th Mar - 10:43pm
    Trust me I'm a Tory. Difficult one that, I think the answer needs to be a resounding NO.
  • User AvatarGlenn 30th Mar - 10:34pm
    The basic problem is that PIP was introduced to reduce the benefits bill. This is why it involves humiliating interviews and you can't just send...
  • User AvatarRichard Fortescue 30th Mar - 9:24pm
    Steve, my understanding is that the 9-1 grading is explicitly a return to norm referencing. But, as someone teaching 9-1 GCSEs, I am not wholly...
  • User AvatarFiona 30th Mar - 8:57pm
    I accept that theoretical premise of not wasting time and resources on cosmetic changes is reasonable, but there must be a rigorous system in place...