Law Commission sets out details for review of election law

From the Law Commission’s website:

We have commenced work on reforming electoral law.  We expect to open a consultation in late 2014.  A report with recommendations to Government will be published in summer 2015…

The twin aims of the project are to ensure, first, that electoral laws are presented within a rational, modern legislative framework, governing all elections and referendums under statute; and second, that the law governing the conduct of elections and referendums is modern, simple, and fit for purpose.

More details are on the Law Commission’s website but it’s worth noting that the prime intent is to tidy up the current law rather than create radically different laws. In the Law Commission’s phrase, electoral law is currently “complex, voluminous and fragmented”. The review is intended to tackle that and not to consider “wider policy issues”.

 

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Richard Marbrow 12th Dec '12 - 12:52pm

    Is “complex, voluminous and fragmented” the newspeak for batcrap crazy?

  • 2015! not sure I can wait that long

  • Peter Hayes 12th Dec '12 - 9:53pm

    What is the point? Both major parties want the HOL as a place to pension off old retainers. And as kick Nick proved a referendum on any changes can be hijacked.

  • Richard Percival 13th Dec '12 - 4:09pm

    “batcrap crazy” – quite possibly, but I am not sure we have a view on what “batcrap” adds to “crazy”.
    Richard Percival, Public Law Team Manager, Law Commission

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAndrew T 22nd Jan - 9:47pm
    @Andrew McCaig - Mostly pensions. I'm unsure on social housing as a good idea, the cost of housing is more a specific problem in London...
  • User AvatarGlenn 22nd Jan - 9:44pm
    No I don't believe in snarling. I think it it's perfectly easy to be cordial, nice and commutative without believing all things are interconnected. Here's...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 22nd Jan - 9:27pm
    Sorry that I can't be there to help. Australia is too far away to commute or phone canvass! I will be cheering you on from...
  • User Avatarpaul holmes 22nd Jan - 9:15pm
    @Andrew T. When the Lib Dems were campaigning for specific tax increases for specific purposes in the 1997/2001/2005 General Elections we successively won our 3...
  • User AvatarCaracatus 22nd Jan - 9:11pm
    Well done Nick , talking up UKIP just before two crucial by-elections. It ill becomes someone who was so useless in Government to criticise Labour...
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 22nd Jan - 9:03pm
    Andrew T Can you tell us what "welfare spending" you want to cut? Disability benefits again? I would be in favour of cutting the huge...