<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LDV members’ survey (5): what you think of the Lib Dem shadow cabinet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:56:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam Pennington</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html#comment-61775</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Pennington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3696#comment-61775</guid>
		<description>Lembit may talk sense but being in the press for all the wrong reasons and being filmed doing, amongst other things, a flippin&#039; Segway advert and being on a TV show featuring - what was it? - a man playing a piano with his penis? 

Had I my way, I know where I&#039;d like to see Lembit Opik...Not in the House of Commons, for one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lembit may talk sense but being in the press for all the wrong reasons and being filmed doing, amongst other things, a flippin&#8217; Segway advert and being on a TV show featuring &#8211; what was it? &#8211; a man playing a piano with his penis? </p>
<p>Had I my way, I know where I&#8217;d like to see Lembit Opik&#8230;Not in the House of Commons, for one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sesenco</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html#comment-61763</link>
		<dc:creator>Sesenco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3696#comment-61763</guid>
		<description>Julia Goldsworthy should be at the bottom of the list (is there a &quot;below bottom place&quot; category?). She is an authoritarian conservative in favour of marshal law for young people. What is she doing in the Shadow Cabinet in the first place? I thought our spokespeople were supposed to be liberals.

One or two comments:

Steve Webb has the handicap of a Birmingham accent. He is actually a lot better than he looks.

Norman Baker&#039;s high rating is welcome. More power to his elbow.

Lembit has terrible judgment about women, but that doesn&#039;t mean he isn&#039;t a good politician. When he opens his mouth he does tend to talk sense.

Jeremy Browne ought to do better. He suffers from a low media profile. Perhaps Mr Clegg should put him in the spotlight more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia Goldsworthy should be at the bottom of the list (is there a &#8220;below bottom place&#8221; category?). She is an authoritarian conservative in favour of marshal law for young people. What is she doing in the Shadow Cabinet in the first place? I thought our spokespeople were supposed to be liberals.</p>
<p>One or two comments:</p>
<p>Steve Webb has the handicap of a Birmingham accent. He is actually a lot better than he looks.</p>
<p>Norman Baker&#8217;s high rating is welcome. More power to his elbow.</p>
<p>Lembit has terrible judgment about women, but that doesn&#8217;t mean he isn&#8217;t a good politician. When he opens his mouth he does tend to talk sense.</p>
<p>Jeremy Browne ought to do better. He suffers from a low media profile. Perhaps Mr Clegg should put him in the spotlight more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crewegwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html#comment-61760</link>
		<dc:creator>crewegwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3696#comment-61760</guid>
		<description>Couple of points :

I&#039;m amazed that anybody outside the rarified atmosphere of Westminster and/or legal circles would have the faintest idea what a &quot;Shadow Solicitor General&quot; does, never mind whether David Howarth does it well !!!  I met David during the C&amp;N byelection, but don&#039;t recall solicitor generalling being a big issue on the Market Square !!

One other (tongue in cheek) observation. Wonder if we have any members who would regard &quot;quite&quot; as a stronger position than &quot;very&quot;.  Is xxxxx quite ineffective or very ineffective?  &#039;Oh, he&#039;s quite ineffective&#039; [meaning totally ineffective, as opposed to meaning rather ineffective].  Such are the subtleties of your strange English language ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of points :</p>
<p>I&#8217;m amazed that anybody outside the rarified atmosphere of Westminster and/or legal circles would have the faintest idea what a &#8220;Shadow Solicitor General&#8221; does, never mind whether David Howarth does it well !!!  I met David during the C&amp;N byelection, but don&#8217;t recall solicitor generalling being a big issue on the Market Square !!</p>
<p>One other (tongue in cheek) observation. Wonder if we have any members who would regard &#8220;quite&#8221; as a stronger position than &#8220;very&#8221;.  Is xxxxx quite ineffective or very ineffective?  &#8216;Oh, he&#8217;s quite ineffective&#8217; [meaning totally ineffective, as opposed to meaning rather ineffective].  Such are the subtleties of your strange English language &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html#comment-61755</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3696#comment-61755</guid>
		<description>Tristan - to be fair that is the nature of online polls that include an &quot;indifferent&quot; option - most people do these in their coffee breaks and don&#039;t want to spend hours agonising over each answer.

Makes sense to remove the option altogether.

As for Clegg&#039;s rating, I&#039;m surprised by the number of people who are rated higher than him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tristan &#8211; to be fair that is the nature of online polls that include an &#8220;indifferent&#8221; option &#8211; most people do these in their coffee breaks and don&#8217;t want to spend hours agonising over each answer.</p>
<p>Makes sense to remove the option altogether.</p>
<p>As for Clegg&#8217;s rating, I&#8217;m surprised by the number of people who are rated higher than him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Land</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html#comment-61754</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Land</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3696#comment-61754</guid>
		<description>Tristan, we know these people, so we are bound to be more critical; bearing that in mind a positive rating is more difficult than you might think!

I feel this is very much what we would expect, isn&#039;t it? I would agree that Sarah&#039;s post is probably not where she would want to be or should be. I&#039;m VERY PLEASED to see how well David Howarth, my local LD MP is doing - though not at all surprised! Steve Webb? The only one I would disagree on, I&#039;m afraid. If Vince gets a net 96.9%, I&#039;d expect to see Steve around 98.5%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tristan, we know these people, so we are bound to be more critical; bearing that in mind a positive rating is more difficult than you might think!</p>
<p>I feel this is very much what we would expect, isn&#8217;t it? I would agree that Sarah&#8217;s post is probably not where she would want to be or should be. I&#8217;m VERY PLEASED to see how well David Howarth, my local LD MP is doing &#8211; though not at all surprised! Steve Webb? The only one I would disagree on, I&#8217;m afraid. If Vince gets a net 96.9%, I&#8217;d expect to see Steve around 98.5%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oranjepan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html#comment-61753</link>
		<dc:creator>Oranjepan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3696#comment-61753</guid>
		<description>I disagree, Tristan. 

The DK/NO option is well understood to mean neither positive or negative, so until we can disentangle the two we simply cannot know whether the view is neutral or unknown.

However I tend to agree with you in that there is a strong link between &#039;more communication&#039; and &#039;better communication&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, Tristan. </p>
<p>The DK/NO option is well understood to mean neither positive or negative, so until we can disentangle the two we simply cannot know whether the view is neutral or unknown.</p>
<p>However I tend to agree with you in that there is a strong link between &#8216;more communication&#8217; and &#8216;better communication&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html#comment-61752</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3696#comment-61752</guid>
		<description>Norman Lamb is doing really well - particularly in the area of mental health - he deserves to be up there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norman Lamb is doing really well &#8211; particularly in the area of mental health &#8211; he deserves to be up there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html#comment-61749</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3696#comment-61749</guid>
		<description>Some very high Don&#039;t know/No opinion scores for some there which suggests that they are simply unknown (or what they&#039;re doing is unknown) even to the politically aware...
Not a great endorsement of them :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some very high Don&#8217;t know/No opinion scores for some there which suggests that they are simply unknown (or what they&#8217;re doing is unknown) even to the politically aware&#8230;<br />
Not a great endorsement of them :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clegg's Candid Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-5-what-you-think-of-the-lib-dem-shadow-cabinet-3696.html#comment-61748</link>
		<dc:creator>Clegg's Candid Friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3696#comment-61748</guid>
		<description>You wrote previously that &quot;Given the tendency of party members to be critical ... Nick can probably feel pretty relaxed&quot; about his approval rating of 31%.

In that case, with 97% Vince Cable must be dancing on the ceiling!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote previously that &#8220;Given the tendency of party members to be critical &#8230; Nick can probably feel pretty relaxed&#8221; about his approval rating of 31%.</p>
<p>In that case, with 97% Vince Cable must be dancing on the ceiling!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
