<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LDV members&#8217; survey (7): party on right track, Clegg wins +41% approval</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-7-party-on-right-track-clegg-wins-41-approval-6584.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-7-party-on-right-track-clegg-wins-41-approval-6584.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-7-party-on-right-track-clegg-wins-41-approval-6584.html#comment-71891</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=6584#comment-71891</guid>
		<description>Ok, do a poll where people choose who&#039;d do better than Clegg (ok, Vince Cable, but people also said that about Ming Campbell folks!)
Anyway, unless the party does a &quot;Bob Hawke&quot; at the last minute, we&#039;re stuck with him til the next election so people&#039;d better get used to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, do a poll where people choose who&#8217;d do better than Clegg (ok, Vince Cable, but people also said that about Ming Campbell folks!)<br />
Anyway, unless the party does a &#8220;Bob Hawke&#8221; at the last minute, we&#8217;re stuck with him til the next election so people&#8217;d better get used to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennie</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-7-party-on-right-track-clegg-wins-41-approval-6584.html#comment-71863</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=6584#comment-71863</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Liberal Neil, this happened last time as well: I put &quot;fairly effective&quot;, meaning &quot;he&#039;s all right, I suppose, but could do better&quot; and Stephen read it as &quot;everything tickety-boo here&quot; and this time I&#039;ve bloody done it again!

Note to self: put &quot;he&#039;s crap&quot; next time.

I don&#039;t think he IS utterly crap, but if that&#039;s the only way to stop you counting me as perfectly happy when I&#039;m not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Liberal Neil, this happened last time as well: I put &#8220;fairly effective&#8221;, meaning &#8220;he&#8217;s all right, I suppose, but could do better&#8221; and Stephen read it as &#8220;everything tickety-boo here&#8221; and this time I&#8217;ve bloody done it again!</p>
<p>Note to self: put &#8220;he&#8217;s crap&#8221; next time.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think he IS utterly crap, but if that&#8217;s the only way to stop you counting me as perfectly happy when I&#8217;m not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-members-survey-7-party-on-right-track-clegg-wins-41-approval-6584.html#comment-71809</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=6584#comment-71809</guid>
		<description>&quot;In total, then, 70% (74% in October) of LDV-reading party members are satisfied with Nick’s performance&quot;

That assumes that someone who thinks Nick is &#039;fairly effective&#039; is satisfied with that level of performance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In total, then, 70% (74% in October) of LDV-reading party members are satisfied with Nick’s performance&#8221;</p>
<p>That assumes that someone who thinks Nick is &#8216;fairly effective&#8217; is satisfied with that level of performance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

