<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LDV readers say: yes to Church of England disestablishment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-readers-say-yes-to-church-of-england-disestablisment-9526.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-readers-say-yes-to-church-of-england-disestablisment-9526.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:55:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Stradling</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-readers-say-yes-to-church-of-england-disestablisment-9526.html#comment-75765</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Stradling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=9526#comment-75765</guid>
		<description>I think that supporters of disestablishment imagine that it will mean an end to offical sanction, and artifical respect, for superstition.

If I believed that, I&#039;d be all for it.

Sadly, what I see as more likely is the extension of that respect to all the *other* superstitions. And let&#039;s face it, most of them are considerably more iniquitous than &quot;vanilla&quot; CofE.

I fear that Freedom of Religion simply means *More* Religion. Surely, what we should be working towards is Freedom *From* Religion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that supporters of disestablishment imagine that it will mean an end to offical sanction, and artifical respect, for superstition.</p>
<p>If I believed that, I&#8217;d be all for it.</p>
<p>Sadly, what I see as more likely is the extension of that respect to all the *other* superstitions. And let&#8217;s face it, most of them are considerably more iniquitous than &#8220;vanilla&#8221; CofE.</p>
<p>I fear that Freedom of Religion simply means *More* Religion. Surely, what we should be working towards is Freedom *From* Religion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Pearse</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-readers-say-yes-to-church-of-england-disestablisment-9526.html#comment-75723</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pearse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=9526#comment-75723</guid>
		<description>Erm, it&#039;s not a good sign that your commenters see government control of the CofE as a way to &quot;control religion&quot; rather than a service to the community!

End this ancient abuse now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, it&#8217;s not a good sign that your commenters see government control of the CofE as a way to &#8220;control religion&#8221; rather than a service to the community!</p>
<p>End this ancient abuse now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-readers-say-yes-to-church-of-england-disestablisment-9526.html#comment-75603</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=9526#comment-75603</guid>
		<description>Rob Stradling, perhaps the model of the Netherlands is in that case more encouraging. No established religion for over 100 years (though the monarch still can&#039;t be a catholic), and the country is considered to be one of the most tolerants. Then there&#039;s France, though not really liberal, not a theocracy either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob Stradling, perhaps the model of the Netherlands is in that case more encouraging. No established religion for over 100 years (though the monarch still can&#8217;t be a catholic), and the country is considered to be one of the most tolerants. Then there&#8217;s France, though not really liberal, not a theocracy either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Stradling</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ldv-readers-say-yes-to-church-of-england-disestablisment-9526.html#comment-75601</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Stradling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=9526#comment-75601</guid>
		<description>Hmm...

While I abhor the existence of an &quot;official&quot; religion in a modern democracy, the pragmatist in me has to acknowledge that the Church of England has been a very effective mechanism for keeping religion &quot;under control&quot;. 

Whenever I dream of church/state separation in the UK, I remind myself of the USA - a nation whose founding principles included it, but which looks more depressingly theocratic with each passing headline. With that example, it&#039;s hard to imagine disestablishment having the effect here that its supporters - and I - would desire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;</p>
<p>While I abhor the existence of an &#8220;official&#8221; religion in a modern democracy, the pragmatist in me has to acknowledge that the Church of England has been a very effective mechanism for keeping religion &#8220;under control&#8221;. </p>
<p>Whenever I dream of church/state separation in the UK, I remind myself of the USA &#8211; a nation whose founding principles included it, but which looks more depressingly theocratic with each passing headline. With that example, it&#8217;s hard to imagine disestablishment having the effect here that its supporters &#8211; and I &#8211; would desire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

