LDVideo: David Laws on the future of the coalition

A couple of weeks ago, David Laws made a speech at Parliament, organised by the Bright Blue think tank, expressing his views on the future of the coalition.

You can watch the very interesting speech below, or on YouTube here.

* Nick Thornsby is Thursday Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs here.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in YouTube.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/27861 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

12 Comments

  • Bald Reynard 29th Mar '12 - 4:02pm

    Well now it’s pretty clear. To quote DL, the terms ‘Progressive Conservative’ and, “small ‘l’ liberal” are interchangeable. He sees no difference between himself, a ‘liberal’ and many (progressive) Conservatives – presumably most of the ‘Cameroonians’. He speaks so glowingly of the Coalition. Listening to Mr Laws, I really find it so difficult to believe that I’m a member of the same party as him. Will he redress the situation – by actually joining his ‘natural allies’ in the Tories – or should I do it, by leaving a Party which I’ve been a member of for 30 years (far longer than David Laws, I would imagine). I don’t think the current ‘broad Church’ of economic liberals / progressive Conservatives (like DL and most Lib Dems in the Cabinet) and social liberals can really hold for 3 more years , can it ?!

  • This group is obviously the latest incarnation of the One Nation Tories that Thatcher tried to suffocate, but how can anyone describe themselves as a “progressive conservative”? The two words mean mutually exclusive things.

    Still I like this think tank’s tag line: “progressive > conservative”. They do know what the “>” sign means, don’t they?

  • I note the complete lack of criticism of the Tory ‘cock-ups’ on LDV.

    We have ministers running around like headless chickens, conflicting stories on just about everything and, from LDV, silence.
    Why no separate voice? After all, as per Cameron’s famous put down, “It’s not as if we’re brothers”.

  • Nick (not Clegg) 30th Mar '12 - 1:13pm

    @ Bald Reynold

    I understand and sympathise with your predicament. Having decided that I am no longer at home as a Liberal Democrat. I have, perforce, to identify myself as a small l liberal, but I am certainly not a conservative, whether “progressive” or otherwise.

  • David Evans 30th Mar '12 - 4:28pm

    When I listen to this, I get such a sense of deja vu. “National Liberals here I come. Right is where I started from.”

    You hum it and I’ll play it.

    Paddy must be in despair.

  • The main use of Progressive as a political label in the UK was for the joint Liberal and Labour platform for the London County Council about a century ago. The Conservatives rans as Moderates.

  • Nick (not Clegg) 30th Mar '12 - 5:01pm

    @ Bald Reynard

    My apologies for misspelling your name.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 24th Nov - 2:57pm
    Stevan Rose But you want to tax the Grandmother that saved and invested more than the Grandmother that blew all her money on extravagant Warners...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 24th Nov - 2:45pm
    nvelope2003 The reality is that the majority who are not poor want to hang on to their money and their relatively comfortable life style and...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 24th Nov - 2:34pm
    Tony Greaves Well I’ve just read the Observer from front to end (missing out the fashion pages) and I did not see this article. It...
  • User AvatarRoland 24th Nov - 1:59pm
    Psi - The reason why you start proceedings against the individual, is that you effectively force them to resolve which capacity they were working in...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 24th Nov - 1:35pm
    Matt (Bristol) Many thanks for that succinct summary with which I heartily agree!
  • User Avatarmatt (Bristol) 24th Nov - 1:35pm
    Hmm. I respect Danny Alexander, but this confirms my strong desire that he do not lead the party in the near future. If he is...